MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT - JABALPUR CAUSE LIST

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT - JABALPUR DAILY CAUSE LIST

(For 18th, Jun, 2013 )

COURT ROOM. " "
BEFORE :
1d1818000
01.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( I )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE U.C. MAHESHWARI
COURT ROOM NO.: 6
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[FIXED DATE CASES]
.

1. WP 22017/2011(O) M/S IDEAL MINERALS MANOJ SHARMA
PARAG TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
R.S.SIDDIQUE [ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL]
SANJAY DWIVEDI [GA FOR R1]
AKSHAY DHARMADHIKARI(R-2,3)
[FOR ADM., IA 6835/12 FOR VACATING STAY AND IA 6843/12 FOR VACATING
STAY]

2. CRA 897/2011 RADHELAL SOURABH SHARMA
SHASHANK UPADHYAY, M.P.SHARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR IA.7022/13FOR GRANT OF BAIL.]W/R
.

3. RP 767/2012 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
Versus
SATISH BHARGAVA KU. MALTI DADARIYA [R1 TO R3]
K.S.WADHWA
GAJENDRA TAMSIKAR, PUSHPANJLY DWIVEDI [1-3]
FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE CO
.
[FRESH MATTERS]
.

4. WP 10244/2013(I) RAJENDRA PRASAD TIWARI SMT. SUDHA PANDIT
SHREYAS PANDIT, JANHAVI PANDIT
Versus
RAMSHIROMANI PANDEY A.G.
[FOR ADMISSION AND IA NO.8143/2013 APPL. FOR GRANT OF STAY ] C.S.
[FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE]
.

5. WP 24326/2003 KISHAN LAL BERMAIYA S.S.SHARMA
K.N.AGRAWAL,SAKET AGRAWAL,R.K.HORA
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. ADVOCATE GENERAL
[ FOR FINAL DISPOSAL ]
.

6. WP 27874/2003(O) JAY PEE REWA CEMENT LTD. R.M.SHARMA.MOHD.ASIF,MANIKANT SHARMA
MS.MAMTA BILLORE,ANNAPOORNA SHARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. AG
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE] W/C LINK WITH WP 2578/03 (D)
AND WP 2789/03 (D)
WITH

7. WP 27875/2003(O) JAY PEE REWA CEMENT LTD. R.M.SHARMA,MOHD.ASIF,MANIKANT SHARMA
MS.MAMTA BILLORE
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

8. WP 27876/2003(O) JAY PEE REWA CEMENT LTD. RM. SHARMA, MOHD.ASIF,MANIKANT SHARMA
MS.MAMTA BILLORE,MANOJ KUSHWAHA
Versus
STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. AG
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.
WITH

9. WP 27877/2003(O) JAY PEE REWA CEMENT LTD. RM. SHARMA, MOHD. ASIF,MANIKANT SHARMA
MS.MAMTA BILLORE
Versus
STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. A.G.
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.
WITH

10. WP 27878/2003(O) JAY PEE REWA CEMENT R.M.SHARMA,MOHD.ASIF,MANIKANT SHARMA
MS.MAMTA BILLORE,MANOJ KUSHWAHA
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. A.G.[1-4]
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.
WITH

11. WP 27879/2003(O) JAY PEE REWA CEMENT LTD. R.M.SHARMA,MOHD.ASIF
MS.MAMTA BILLORE
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. AG
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.

12. WP 12336/2008(S) MANOJ KUMAR DWIVEDI KC.GHILDIYAL,MK.RAJ,AK,PRADEEP DWIVEDI,SMT.S.DUBEY
DK.DIXIT,ANSHUL DIXIT,SHAILESH JAIN[2]
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL,PANKAJ DUBEY,SHEETAL DUBEY,
G.P.SINGH [1,2,]
[INTERVENER]
KN.AGRAWAL,KU.PRABAL GUPTA,RK.HORA,SAKET AGRAWAL
NARENDRA KUMAR,ALOK PANDEY[INTERVENER]
(FOR FINAL DISPOSAL)
.
WITH

13. WP 12321/2008(S) VIJAY KUMAR KHANDELWAL N.K.SALUNKE
J.K.PILLAI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL, PANKAJ DUBEY,[CAVEAT]
SHAILESH MISHRA,
SANJAY K. AGARWAL [CAVEAT],B.BHIDHE
NAREDNRA PANDEY, ALOK PANDEY [CAVEAT]
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL]
.
Pg:3 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE U.C. MAHESHWARI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WITH

14. WP 12385/2008(S) DEVENDRA KUAMR JAIN R.L.GUPTA,SIDHARTH GUPTA,SK.GARG,K.C.GHILDIYAL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL,P.K.KAURAV
SAMDARISH TIWARI G.A.[R1AND2]
PANKAJ DUBEY,MRS.SHEETAL DUBEY,ALOK PANDEY,[INTER]
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL]
.
WITH

15. WP 806/2009(S) LAXMI PRASAD SINGOR VIJAY TRIPATHI,A.CHOUDHARY,K.C.GHILDIYAL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PANKAY DUBEY, SHEETAL DUBEY, NARENDRA KUMAR
SHAILESH MISHRA [ALL],R.C.SHRIVASTAVA,A.G.
ALOK PANDEY [CAVEAT],K.C.GHILDIYAL,B.BHIDHE
[ FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE ]
.
WITH

16. WP 4048/2009(S) SANJEEV KUMAR JAIN PRANAY VERMA,S.K.AGRAWAL,K.C.GHILDYAL
Versus
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
SAMDARSHI TIWARI(R1ANDR2),S.K.SINGH,M.PURNIK
SANJAY K AGARWAL, AMIT SEHT, R MISHRA(INTERVNOR)
[FOR FINAL HEARING AT MOTION STAGE ]
.
WITH

17. WP 5222/2009(S) PREM SHANKAR GUPTA KU. NIRMALA RAIKWAR
ASHOK AGARWAL, YOGENDR PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
SANJAY DWIVEDI
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL]
.
WITH

18. WP 2919/2010(S) S.S.THAKUR SANJAY K. AGRAWAL,K.C.GHILDIYAL
A. SETH, RAHUL MISHRA, P BHATNAGAR, R.K. KUSHWAHA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
JAIDEEP SINGH[GA 1-2]
ANAGHA PAUL,VIJAY TRIPATHI,[17]
AKASH CHOUDHARY,ANAGHA PAUL,VIJAY TRIPATHI,[40]
R.K.VERMA,PREETI KHANNA,A.BEOHAR(R-18,31,37)
P.YADAV,P.TIWARI,M.CHANA(23)
A.PAUL,V.TRIPATHI,A.CHOUDHARY,S.NANDY
M.P.SHUKLA,RAJENDRA PATEL [14,34]
[ FOR FINAL DISPOSAL ]
.
WITH

19. WP 7102/2010(S) DHIRENDRA KUMAR VERMA ANOOP NAIR,P.DUBEY
P. SHANKARAN NAIR, SHISHIR DIXIT, SHARAD PUNJ
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
RAHUL DIWAKAR(R-23)
Pg:4 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE U.C. MAHESHWARI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
V.K.SHUKLA,R.K.TIWARI,U.R.MISHRA,ABHISHEK
PANKAJ DUBEY,NARENDRA KUMAR(R20)
VIKRAM SINGH, [26,35]
RAJNEESH PATEL(R-25)
R.S.KUSHWAHA(R-4,5,6,7,89,10,12,15,16)
SANJAY K.AGRAWAL,A.SETH,R.MISHRA,P.BHATNAGAR
R.S.KUSHWAHA(R-22,24)
SANJAY K.AGRAWAL,A.SETH,R.MISHRA,P.BHATNAGAR
VIVEK RUSIA,PRITI RUSIA[21]
[ FOR ORDERS ]
.
WITH

20. WP 10161/2010(S) JANGBAHADUR SINGH KUSHWAH D.P.SINGH
A.J.PAWAR
MRIGENDRA SINGH,HITENDRA SINGH,M.NIGAM
Versus
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL,M.P.S.RAGHUVANSHI
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AND IA.NO. 13900/2011 FOR ISSUANCE OF AD-INTERIM
WRIT AND IA.NO. 10704/2011 FOR ISSUANCE OF AD-INTERIM WRIT ]
WITH

21. CONC 854/2011(S) HARIOM AGRWAL K.C.GHILDIYAL
M.K. RAJAK, P. DWIVEDI, P.T. SINGH, H.C. SINGH
Versus
SHRI K.K.SINGH SAMDARSHI TIWARI,PRANAY CHOUBEY,N.K.CHOUDHARY [1]
(FOR ORDERS ON I.A. NO. 7263/2011 PERMISSION TO FILE CONTEMPT PETITION)
WITH

22. CONC 859/2011(S) BHARAT LAL CHOURASIYA BRINDAVAN TIWARI
R.B.S. TOMAR
Versus
SHRI S. K. SINGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SAMDARSHI TIWARI (2)
[ FOR ADMISSION ]
.
WITH

23. CONC 884/2011(S) S.K.KANOONGO K.C.GHILDIYAL
M.K. RAJAK, P. DWIVEDI, P.T. SINGH, H.C. SINGH
Versus
SHRI K.K.SINGH VIVEK AGRAWAL [1]
[FOR ORDERS ON I.A. NO. 7264/2011 FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE
CONTEMPT PETITION]
WITH

24. CONC 1560/2011(S) KAUSHAL KISHORE TRIPATHI K.C.GHILDIYAL
M.K. RAJAK, H.C. SINGH, P. DWIVEDI
Versus
SHRI K.K.SINGH S.S.BISEN [1 AND 2]
[ FOR ADMISSION AND IA.NO. 11896/2
011.FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE
CONTEMPT ]
WITH

25. WP 12488/2011(S) MOTI LAL JESWANI D.K. DIXIT
Pg:5 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

26. CONC 548/2012(S) NARENDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL D.K. DIXIT
ANSHUL DIXIT, SHAILESH JAIN
Versus
SHRI K.K. SINGH ADVOCATE GENERAL
SUDESH VERMA [1]
[ FOR ADMISSION ]
.
WITH

27. CONC 567/2012(S) MOTI LAL JESWANI K.C. GHIDIYAL
M.K. RAJAK, P. DWIVEDI, H.C. SINGH
Versus
SHRI K.K. SINGH ADVOCATE GENERAL
SAMEER CHILE,MUNISH SAINI, [1]
FOR ADMISSION AND ORDERS ON IA NO.4397/2012 APPL. SEEKING PERMISSION
TO FILE CONT. PETITION ]
WITH

28. CONC 1469/2012(S) K. BALASUBREMANIAM IYER K.C. GHILDIYAL
M.K.RAJAK, P.DWIVEDI, H.C.SINGH
Versus
SHRI K.K. SINGH ADVOCATE GENERAL
VIVEK AGRAWAL(R-2)
[ FOR ORDERS ON IA NO.9878/2012 APPL. FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO
FILE CONT. PETITION AND IA NO. 9879/2012 APPL. FOR CONDONATION OF
DELAY ]
WITH

29. CONC 1558/2012(S) SHEIKH KAYYUM SHAKEEL AHMAD
SHAILENDRA DUBEY
Versus
SHRI ASHOK KUMAR SINHA ANOOP NAIR,P.SHANKARAN(R-3)
[ FOR ADMISSION ]
.
WITH

30. CONC 142/2013(S) VIPIN KOCHAR K.C.GHILDIYAL
M.K. RAJAK, P. DWIVEDI, H.C.SINGH
Versus
K.K.SINGH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ORDERS ON IA NO. 663/2013 APPL PETITIO AND IA NO. 662/2013 APPL. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY]

31. WP 8445/2009 DWARKA PRASAD DUBEY PRADEEP NAVERIYA
SNAJAY SONI, AJAY SEN VERSHA GUPTA
Versus
BRANCH MANAGER PRAMOD THAKRE,SUDEEP PATEL [1,2]
FOR ADMISSION /I.R. AND FINAL DISPOSAL
Pg:6 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE U.C. MAHESHWARI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

32. WP 3039/2012(I) PRABHU PRATAP SINGH RAVENDRA SHUKLA
S.K. DUBEY
Versus
SMT. KUNTI
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.

33. WP 6759/2013(I) NARENDRA SURI ASHISH SHROTI
VIKRAM JOHRI, AMIT NAGPAL
Versus
RANJEET SHAH PRAVEEN SHARMA, V AWASTHY, D SINGH(R1)
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1d1827000
01.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( II )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI SHANKAR JHA
COURT ROOM NO.: 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[FIXED DATE CASES]
.

1. WP 5752/2002(S) ASHOK KUMAR ANWANE BB.DUBEY, SK.DUBEY,AD.MISHRA,R.P.DUBEY
Versus
DISTRICT JUDGE, BETUL AND ANR. AG.,AS.RAIZADA,KU.PL.SHRIVASTAVA[1-3]
MENON ASSO.
V.AWASTHY
(FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION HEARING STAGE)
.

2. WP 7831/2005(S) SATYA NARAYAN DUBEY SANJAY SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH A.G(1,2)
[FOR IA.NO. 12952/2012 SEEKING DIRECTION FOR PAYMENT OF SALARY
AND I.A. NO. 1980/2013 FOR INITIATING CONC PROCEEDING ON R2 AND I.A.
5128/2013 FOR VACATING STAY]

3. WP 13520/2010(S) RAJESH SINGH ANSHUMAN SINGH
SATYENRA PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH V.K.SHUKLA
RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI(R-2)
(INTERVENER)
DILEEP PANDEY, ARUN PANDEY,DHARMENDRA TIWARI
V.K. SHUKLA, RK TIWARI, U R MISHRA,A. GULATEE(R2)
FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE
.
WITH

4. WP 12847/2010(S) SUDHAKAR PRASAD PANDEY D K TRIPATHI
P.N.DUBEY,PRAVEEN DUBEY,NAVEEN DUBEY,SEEPJA DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL,V.K.SHUKLA
ARUN PANDEY, AJAY TIWARI(R3)
DILEEP PANDEY(CAVEAT)
ARUN PANDEY(CAVEAT)
DILEEP PANDEY,A PANDEY,D TIWARI(R2)
FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAHE
.
WITH

5. WP 13887/2010(S) SUDHAKAR PRASAD PANDAY D K TRIPATHI
AWADHESH KU. MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
SWAPNIL GANGULY, AJAY TIWARI(INTERVENOR)
DILEEP PANDEY,ARUN PANDEY, DHARMENDRA TIWARI[2]
[ ON IA.NO. 1634/2012 FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE ]
.

6. WP 5978/2013(S) SHAILESH KUMAR PATEL N.S. RUPRAH
MRS. A.RURAH ,S.R. SHUKLA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
K.S.WADHWA,VANDANA SHRIVASTAVA(R-3)
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI SHANKAR JHA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FOR IA.NO.7897/2013 FOR VACATING STAY AND IA.NO.7898/2013 FOR URGENT
HEARING DURING SUMMER VACATION
WITH

7. WP 6388/2013(S) VIJAY RATHOD PRAMOD KUMAR PANDEY
HITYANAND MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
K.S.WADHWA,VANDANA SHRIVASTAVA(R-3)
FOR IA.NO. 7914/2013 FOR VACATING INTERIM ORDER AND IA.NO.7915/2013
FOR URGENT HEARING DURING SUMMER VACATION
[INTERIM MATTERS]
.

8. WPS 4181/2004 M.P.CONSULTANCY ORGANISATION LTD. KU.PL.SHRIVASTAVA,SP.RAI,
Versus
PRAHLAD KUMAR KANOJIA AND ANR. HANSRAJ BHARTI,T.S.THAKUR,SATISH MISHRA[1]
FOR FINAL DISPSAL
.
[FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE]
.

9. WP 3239/2001(S) MUNICIPAL CORP., JABALPUR AND ORS SANDEEP,SANJAY K.,SANJAY AGRAWAL,S.BEOHAR
ANSHUMAN SINGH, SATYENDRA SINGH
P.YADAV
Versus
MEMBER JUDGE, INDUSTRIAL COURT AND ORS KN.PETHIA(3),RAJESH SONI
FOR FINAL DISPOSAL IN MOTION HEARING
.

10. WP 11244/2009(S) RAMAKANT GAUTAM SANJAY K. AGRAWAL
RAHUL MISHRA, P. BHATNAGAR, R.S. KUSHWAHA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
G.A.(R-1)
MENON ASSOCIATES
[ FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION HEARING STAGE ]
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1d1837000
01.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( III )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV
COURT ROOM NO.: 11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[FIXED DATE CASES]
.

1. WP 11722/2008 MAHENDRA SINGH YADAV SIDDHARTH SINGH CHAUHAN,PANKAJ DUBEY
D.K.DIXIT, ANSHUL DIXIT, SHAILESH JAIN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL,GS.AHLUWALIYA
PRASHANT SINGH [1,2,]
ADITYA ADHIKARI, SATISH CHATURVEDI [3,4]
SANJAY SINGH,RP.MISHRA,[5],P.K.UPADHYAYA
(FOR FINAL HEARING AT MOTION STAGE]
.

2. WP 14108/2011(O) BAIJNATH PRASAD DINESH PRASAD PATEL
RAKESH KUMAR PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
AMIT KHATRI,A.V.SINGH(R-5)
MRIGENDRA SINGH,H.SINGH,V.MAHAWAR
[ FOR FINAL HEARING]
.

3. WP 599/2012(O) CHOTELAL JAIN JAIDEEP SIRPURKAR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
MANOJ SANGHI, S SANGHI, R SINGH, PC KURMI(R5,6)
SHAILENDRA SINGH BISEN [GA R1 TO R4]
ATUL ANAND AWASTHY, R.N.JHA, R.K.PANDEY (7)
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.] W.C.
.

4. MCC 731/2013 M.S. KALANTAR AGROTECH PVT. LTD. GIRISH SHRIVASTAVA
SAURABH SAHANI
Versus
JABALPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIVEK AGRAWAL,FOR R-1(ON ADV.COPY)
FOR ADMISSION AND I.A.NO. 6557/201
3.FOR AD INTERIM RELIEF ](LINKWITH
WP 5339/12-D AND WP 599/12-PENDING) (FD)
[FRESH MATTERS]
.

5. WP 9685/2013(O) SMT. SUBHASH KUMARI VISHWAKARMA A.P. SINGH
PRAVEEN SHARMA
VIVEK SHUKLA, RAJENDRA SINGH, NOKESH DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
RAJROOP PATEL (CAVEAT)
AKHILESH SINGH(CAVEAT)
[FOR ADMISSION AND IR ]
.
[AFTER NOTICE MATTERS]
.

6. WP 7269/2013(O) SMT. GEETA MISHRA SUSHRUT A, DHARMADHIKARI
GAUTAM PRASAD,HIMANSHU SHRIVASTAVA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA GOVIND PATEL
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N.S.RUPRAH,A.RUPRAH,SITA RAM SHUKLA(R-1TO 5)
FOR ADM AND IR AND IA NO. 6505/13 FOR AMENDMENT.
.

7. CONC 101/2012 RAJENDRA TIWARI SANJAY SARWATE
R.K. RAGHUWANSHI
Versus
KAVINDRA KIYAAWAT ADVOCATE GENERAL
SWAPNIL SOHGAURA (2)
SANJEEV MISHRA, HIMANSHU MISHRA,
SK KASHYAP, OP KEWAT, D KEWAT(R1)
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE
.

8. CONC 1514/2012 KISHORI DHIMAR SHRI VIVEK RUSIA
SWAPNESH PRASAD
Versus
SHRI R L BHARTI ADVOCATE GENERAL
V.K. KUSHWAHA, SMT. UPMA TIWARI [2]
ASHOK KUMAR CHOURASIYA, SMT. SARITA CHOURASIA,
ASHOK KUMAR CHAURASIA, SMT. SARITA CHAURASIA [1]
[FOR ADMISSION]
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1d1851100
001.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
COURT ROOM NO.: 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS]
.

1. WP 9541/2013(I) LAXMI CHAND JAIN MANOJ JAIN
K.L. GUPTA
Versus
SMT. SUKHWATI BAI
TYPED COPY OF PAGE NO.31 AND 35.
.

2. WP 9542/2013(O) TULSIRAM @ BADDA ARVIND CHOUKSEY
K.K. AGNIHOTRI ANWAR AHMED
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
(1) DECLARATION NOT FILED
.

3. WP 9547/2013(I) GOVIND PRASAD GUPTA MANOJ SANGHI
SANKALP SANGHI, P.C. KURMI
Versus
SANDEEP KUMAR GUPTA N.P. PANDEY(CAVEAT)

1. MARKING OF ANNEXURE OF IMPUGNED ORDER IS IN-CORRECT IN PARA

1.AND PARA 7(1) ON THE PETITION. 2 A.K.N. ON THE VAKALATNAMA. NOTE- CAVEAT ATTACHED.

4. WP 9548/2013(S) RAJ KUMAR TIWARI A.K. SINGH
SMT. ANUBHA SINGH, AJAY DWIVEDI, D.P. PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1. LEGIBLE COPY OF PG. NO. 16,17,19,20,21,24 AND 33 TO 35.
.

5. WP 9549/2013(I) BHUPENDRA RAVINDRA BISEN
DEVENDRA RAJ SURYAWANSHI
Versus
BHOJRAM
(1) TYPED COPIES OF HAND-WRITTEN DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.PAGE NO.20,29-32,34,36-40
(2) IDENTIFICATION OF THUMB IMPRESSION.ON VAKALATNAMA
(3) ANNP/1,P/2 NOT TRUE COPIED
.

6. WP 9550/2013(O) KAMTA PRASAD BIYAR MAHESH SHUKLA
M.PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
(1) LEGIBLE COPIES OF DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.ANN.P/4
(2) LIST OF DOCUMENT IS INCOMPLETE
.

7. WP 9554/2013(O) SMT. HEERA DEVI VYAS SMT. SAROJ DEHARIA
Versus
THE COLLECTOR SATNA ADVOCATE GENERAL
(1) LEGIBLE COPIES OF DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.ANN.P/3
(2) TYPED COPIES OF HAND-WRITTEN DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.ANN.P/2
.

8. WP 9557/2013(S) SANTOSH KUMAR DWIVEDI A.K. SINGH
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SMT. ANUBHA SINGH, AJAY DWIVEDI, ANUBHA SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
(1) LEGIBLE COPIES OF DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.ANN.P/4
(2) TYPED COPIES OF HAND-WRITTEN DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.PAGE 17
.

9. WP 9560/2013(S) GOURI SHANKER GARG ASHISH TRIVEDI
ASEEM TRIVEDI, RITESH SHARMA, ANAND SHUKLA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
(1) LEGIBLE COPIES OF DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.PAGE 1
(2) TYPED COPIES OF HAND-WRITTEN DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.PAGE 11,14,15
AND ANN.P/8
(3) DECLARATION NOT FILED
.

10. WP 9565/2013(S) SMT. OMLATA SHRIVASTAVA A.K. SINGH
SMT. ANUBHA SINGH, AJAY DWIVEDI, ANUBHA SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
(1) LEGIBLE COPIES OF DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.PAGE 37
(2) TYPED COPIES OF HAND-WRITTEN DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.PAGE NO. 39,41,44,45

11. WP 9567/2013(O) DR. MUKHTYAAR AHMAD ATUL CHOUDHARY
P. DUBEY, M. ASIF SIDDIQUE
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
(1) INCORRECT INDEX.
(2) LEGIBLE COPIES OF DOCUMENTS NOT FILED.PAGE NO.30
(3) TYPED COPIES OF HAND-WRITTEN DOCUMENTS NOT FILED. PAGE 27-29,38
(4) NON ATTESTATION OF DOCUMENTS AS TRUE COPY
(5) LIST OF DOCUMENT (PAGE 12) NOT FILED
.

12. WP 9570/2013(S) SMT. KAUSHALYA MUKESH PANDEY
H.S. VERMA, M. SHRIVASTAVA, PRASANT SHRIVAS
Versus
THE WESTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED
1) INCOMPLETE DECLARATION (SIGNATURE OF THE COUNSEL AND PERSON
TO WHOM COPY SERVED IN DECLARATION)

13. WP 9571/2013(O) QUALITY PUBLISHING CO.PVT. LTD A.K. SINGH
SMT. ANUBHA SINGH, AJAY DWIVEDI, D.P. PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1.SIGNATURE OF THE COUNSEL ON THE INDEX,CHRONOLOGICAL EVENTS AND
PETITION. 2.DECLARATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT REGARDING THE ADVANCE
COPY SERVED TO R.N.2 AND 3.

14. WP 9572/2013(S) SMT. TARA MEHRA ATUL NEMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1. LEGIBLE COPY OF PG. NO. 17 TO 19.AND 24.
.
Pg:3 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15. WP 9577/2013(S) SMT. SARIKA PAROHA P.S. TOMAR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1. LEGIBLE COPY OF PG. NO. 12,16,18,22,34 TO 36.
.

16. WP 9579/2013(S) RAM PURVIYA JITENDRA ARYA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
1)COURT FEES WORTH RS.750/- ON MEMO OF PETITION, C.F. WORTH RS.
20/- AND A.K.N. WORTH RS. 150/- ON VAKALATNAMA.

17. WP 9582/2013(I) ASHRAFILAL MUKHTAR AHMAD
S.N. SIDDIQUI, SHRIKANT JAIN, ANURADHA PATEL
Versus
MAGANLAL KORI

1. LEGIBLE COPY OF PG. NO. 10 TO 14. 2. TYPED COPY OF PG. NO. 40
TO 43.

18. WP 9584/2013(S) RAMAVTAR SINGH RAKESH SINGH
NAVEEN SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1.TYPED COPY OF PG.24 NOT ANNEXED WITH THE TRUE COPY OF THE SAME.

19. WP 9585/2013(S) BRAHMA DUTT [B.D.] PATHAK K.N.PETHIA
R.S. TRIPATHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1.LEGIBLE COPY OF PG.19 TO 22. 2.TYPED COPY OF P/4.
.

20. WP 9589/2013(O) EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CITY) M.P.P.K.V.V.COM.LTD. AMALPUSHP SHROTI
NIVEDITA SHROTI, MADHUR SHUKLA
Versus
SMT. ASHA JAIRATH

1.C.C. OF IMPUGNED ORDER P/6 WITH C.F. 2.ATTESTATION BY THE COUNSEL
ON P/6 AND P/7.

21. WP 9601/2013(S) IKRAMUDDIN SURYA PRATAP RAI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1.LEGIBLE COPY OF P/10.
.

22. WP 9603/2013(S) MENULAL AHIRWAR R.K. VERMA
P. KHANNA, S. SHRIVASTAVA, S. SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1.PARTICULARS OF IMPUGNED ORDER IN PARA 1 OF THE PETITION. 2.TYPED
COPY OF P/2. 3.LEGIBLE COPY OF P/4,P/5. 4.CORRECT DATE OF IMPUGNED
ORDER P/6 IN INDEX AND P/4 IN PARA
7.OF PETITION.

23. WP 9605/2013(S) YASHODA NANDAN DWIVEDI A.K. SHUKLA
R.P. MISHRA
Pg:4 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

1.DECLARATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT REGARDING THE ADVANCE COPY SERVED
TO R.N.3. 2.TYPED COPY OF PG.33.

24. WP 9628/2013(O) VINAY KUMAR TRIPATHI SANJAY SARWATE
R.K. RAGHUVANSHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1.LEGIBLE COPY OF PG.14 AND 15.
.

25. WP 9656/2013(O) NAWAL KISHORE SHARMA AMILESH CHATURVEDI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
(1) INSUFFICIENT STAMPS OF A. K. N.

26. WP 10227/2013(O) DEV SANSKRIT UCHCHATAR MADHYAMIK VIDHYALAYA PARAYE U.K. TRIPATHI
S.P. PANDEY, SHISHIR SONI
Versus
M.P. SANSKRIT BOARD ADVOCATE GENERAL
(2)DATE OF SERVICE IN DECLARATION NOT TALLY AS PER ACKNOWLEDGMENT

27. WP 10248/2013(S) ASHISH SOLANKI PRAVEEN PANDEY
DURGESH PANDEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1.PG.14 AND 20 NOT FILED WITH THE PETITION.
.

28. MA 2506/2004 DHURENDER SINGH KAMAL SINGH BAGHEL,S.SINGH
Versus
BHAIYALAL SINGH AND ORS
[FOR DEFAULT OF COUNSEL HAS NOT PAID TO P.F. BY REGISTERED POST

29. MA 3336/2004 RAM DEEN SHRAD GUPTA
Versus
SHAIKH SHAHJAD AND ORS. PRANAY GUPTA,ANISH CHOUKSEY,PRAKASH KORI[3]
[FOR DEFAULT OF P.F. BY ORDINARY MODE
.

30. MA 5090/2010 BANTI SHANKAR SINGH SAMEER BEOHAR
ARPIT VERMA
Versus
MOHAN PRAKASH CHOUREY
[FOR DEFAULT OF P.F. BY REGISTERED MODE
.

31. MA 1369/2013 MOHD. SHAMIM ASHOK CHAKRAVARTY
MANOJ KUMAR YADAV, SMT. GEETA YADAV
Versus
AKHAM BHAI
IN DEFAULT OF P.F. BY ORDINARY MODE
.

32. MA 1378/2013 NAEEM UDDIN KAZI KAPIL PATWARDHAN
Pg:5 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHOBHNA KOSHTA, PURNIMA BHALERAO
Versus
M/S. J.K. TRUST
FOR ORDERS DEFAULT OF CONSEL HAS NOT FILED T5O 2 SET MEMO OF APPEAL

33. MA 1392/2013 MULU SATISH SHRIVASTAVA
VIJAY PASI, RAJBAHADUR SINGH, SURENDRA KORI
Versus
JAIRAM YADAV
FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF COUNSEL HAS NOT FILED TO 3SET COPY MEMO
OF APPEAL

34. MA 1628/2013 SHIV KUMAR KUSHWAHA M.P. RAJAK
SMT. RANNO RAJAK
Versus
FAYAZ ALI THR. LRS BABLU ALI @ NATE
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2
35. MA 1629/2013 SMT. SUBHADRA SAIYAM MAHESH PRASAD RAJAK
G.S. UDDAY
Versus
MOHD. NASEEM MANSOORI
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2 2- IDENTIFIER OF THUMB IMPRESSION AND COMPLETE PARTICULARS OF ALL
APPELLANTS ON POWER.

36. MA 1630/2013 TRIVENI PRASAD MISHRA V.C.RAI
M.S.RAJPUT
Versus
HINCH LAL GAUTAM
IN DEFAULT OF 1- A.K.N. STAMP OF WORTH RS. 30/- REQUIRED MORE ON
POWER. NOTE: THE APPEAL IS BARRED BY 211 DAYS.

37. MA 1633/2013 SMT. ANURADHA RAMKIRPAL MISHRA
PRADEEP DUBEY, ASHISH VISHWAKARMA
Versus
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COM
1- VALUATION OF APPEAL. 2- IDENTIFIER OF THUMB IMPRESSION ON POWER.
3- DEFICIT C.F. OF WORTH RS. 10/- ON C.C. OF AWARD. 4- DEFICIT
C.F. OF 2.5% ON ENHANCED CLAIM AMOUNT. NOTE:- THE APPEAL IS BARRED
BY 05 DAYS.

38. MA 1634/2013 RAHIM KHAN SMT. DEVIKA SINGH
Versus
SMT. SHANTIBAI
IN DEFAULT OF 1- C.C. OF AWARD. 2- DATE OF EXECUTION ON POWER.
NOTE: LIMITATION HAS BEEN CALCULATED ON THE BASIS OF PHOTOCOPY
OF AWARD.

39. MA 1636/2013 KODHARNATH GOSWAMI S.P. MISHRA
V.S. MISHRA
Versus
Pg:6 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2 2- DATE OF EXECUTION ON POWER. 3- IT IS BARRED BY 152 DAYS.

40. MA 1637/2013 BHOJLAL RAKESH KHARE
AJAY TIWARI, AMIT CHOUBEY
Versus
SHAILESH KUMAR DUBEY
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2 NOTE: THE APPEAL IS BARRED BY 132 DAYS.

41. MA 1639/2013 SMT. KANTA MAHESHWARI ABHISHEK ARJARIA
LAKHERA
MUKESH AGRAWAL, SATISH CHOURASIYA, DHANANJAY
Versus
RAJENDRA
IN DEFAULT OF 1- IDENTIFIER OF THUMB IMPRESSION OF APPELLANT NO.2
ON POWER. 2- COMPLETE PARTICULARS OF ALL APPELLANTS ON POWER.

42. MA 1640/2013 SMT. POONAM SINGH S.P. MISHRA
V.S. MISHRA
Versus
RAMESH SINGH
IN DEFAULT OF 1- THERE IS A BLANK SPACE IN CONDONATION OF DELAY
APPLICATION IN PARA 1.

43. MA 1641/2013 SMT. HARIBAI NITIN AGRAWAL
ASHUTOSH CHATURVEDI
Versus
PAPPU
IN DEFAULT OF 1- VALUATION OF APPEAL. 2- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2.5% ON
ENHANCED CLAIM AMOUNT. 3- DEFICIT C.F. OF WORTH RS. 10/- ON C.C.
OF AWARD AND ON APPEAL RESPECTIVELY.

44. MA 1642/2013 SMT. SAROJ SINGH A.K. PANDEY
AWDHESH GUPTA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA
IN DEFAULT OF 1- NATURAL GUARDIAN OF APPELLANT NO. 2 AS SHE IS
MINOR. NOTE: THE APPEAL IS BARRED BY 116 DAYS.

45. MA 1643/2013 CHHOTELAL KOL S.P. MISHRA
V.S.MISHRA
Versus
SURESH SINGH
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2
46. MA 1645/2013 SMT. KUSUM KALI JAISWAL S.P. MISHRA
V.S.MISHRA
Versus
SANDEEP KUMAR TIWARI
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2Pg:7 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2- COUNSEL SIGNATURE ON APPEAL. 3- ADDRESS OF RES.NO. 1 AND 2 ON
APPEAL.

47. MA 1646/2013 JEEVANDAS @ CHIMNI GUPTA S.P. MISHRA
V.S.MISHRA
Versus
PANCHAM SINGH
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2
48. MA 1647/2013 SMT. RAJMATI JAIN D.P. GOLANDAZ
MRS. C.P.GOLANDAZ, Y.S. GOLANDAZ
Versus
SACHIN KUMAR SANT
IN DEFAULT OF 1- SIGN OF EACH APPELLANT ON POWER. 2- DATE OF EXECUTION
ON POWER. 3- AWARDED AMOUNT BEFORE TRIBUNAL DO NOT MENTIONED IN
APPEAL. 4- CORRECT DESIGNATION OF MACT IN PARA 1(E). NOTE: THE
APPEAL IS BARRED BY 145 DAYS.

49. MA 1648/2013 MENANT @ CHHUTTU VISWAKARMA RAVISH DEOLIA
Versus
PUHUP SINGH
IN DEFAULT OF 1- POWER HAS NOT BEEN FILED. 2- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2.5%
ON ENHANCED CLAIM AMOUNT.

50. MA 1649/2013 SMT. PRIYA TRIPATHI S.P. MISHRA
V.S. MISHRA
Versus
SMT. AJAY PATEL
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2 2- THUMB IMPRESSION AND ITS IDENTIFIER ON POWER OF APPELLANT NO.
3.3- THERE IS A BLANK SPACE IN CONDONATION OF DELAY IN PARA 1.
4- SIGN OF COUNSEL ON CONDONATION OF DELAY. NOTE- THE APPEAL IS
BARRED BY 34 DAYS.

51. MA 1650/2013 RAJ RAKHAN SINGH M.P. RAJAK
SMT. RANNO RAJAK
Versus
AKHAND PRATAP SINGH
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DATE OF AWARD DO NOT TELLY WITH C.C. OF AWARD.
NOTE:- THE APPEAL IS BARRED BY 175 DAYS.

52. MA 1651/2013 MUS RANI PRAJAPATI DINESH PRASAD PATEL
A.K.SINGH
Versus
KAILASH MAHTO
IN DEFAULT OF 1-DEFICIT OF 2.5% ON ENHANCED CLAIM AMOUNT.
.

53. MA 1653/2013 HAKIM SINGH VIJAY KUMAR PANDEY
Versus
SMT. MAMTA BAI
IN DEFAULT OF 1- FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTAINABILITY
AS COPY OF DEPOSIT RECEIPT HAS NOT BEEN FILED U/S 173 OF M.V. ACT.
Pg:8 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AND ALSO FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULTS 2- VALUATION OF APPEAL AND CLAIM BEFORE
TRIBUNAL. 3- AWARDED AMOUNT BEFORE TRIBUNAL DO NOT TELLY WITH C.C.
OF AWARD. 4- CORRECT NAME OF RES.NO.5 AS PER C.C. OF AWARD.

54. MA 1654/2013 SAJIYA BE SANJAY GUPTA
SANJAY PANDEY
Versus
ALIM KHAN
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF WORTH RS. 10/- ON C.C. OF AWARD.
2- COMPLETE PARTICULARS OF ALL APPELLANTS ON POWER. NOTE: THE APPEAL
IS BARRED BY 17 DAYS.

55. MA 1655/2013 RAMAVTAR KAMAL SINGH RAJPUT
A.K.TIWARI, LAL JI KUSHWAHA
Versus
BASANTA BAI
IN DEFUALT OF 1- FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTAINABILITY
OF APPEAL AS COPY OF DEPOSIT RECEIPT HAS NOT BEEN FILED U/S 173
OF M.V. ACT. AND ALSO FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULTS 2- DEFICIT C.F. OF RS.
10/- ON C.C. OF AWARD AND RS. 20/- ON POWER. 3- A.K.N. STAMP OF RS.
40/- REQUIRED MORE ON POWER.

56. MA 1656/2013 KAMLESH THAKUR (GOUD) A.K. PANDEY
ANIRUDH PANDEY
Versus
RAJKUMAR SINGH PATEL
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2 NOTE: THE APPEAL IS BARRED BY 260 DAYS.

57. MA 1657/2013 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD N.S. RUPRAH
MRS. A. RUPARAH, S.R.SHUKLA
Versus
USHA JAISWAL
IN DEFAULT OF 1- NAME OF RES. NO.
3.DO NOT TELLY WITH C.C. OF AWARD.
NOTE: THE APPEAL IS BARRED BY 23 DAYS.

58. MA 1659/2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED SUDHA PANDIT
SHREYAS PANDIT, JANHVI PANDIT
Versus
RAJA DOHARE
IN DEFAULT OF 1- FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTAINABILITY
OF APPEAL AS COPY OF DEPOSIT RECEIPT HAS NOT BEEN FILED U/S 173
OF M.V. ACT AND ALSO FOR ORDERS ON THE DEFAULT 2- DATE OF EXECUTION
ON POWER.

59. MA 1660/2013 PHOOL SINGH KAMAL SINGH RAJPUT
A.K.TIWARI, LAL KUSHWAHA
Versus
JAGJEET SINGH
IN DEFAULT OF 1- DEFICIT C.F. OF 2 2- POWER HAS NOT BEEN FILED.3- IT IS BARRED BY 261 DAYS. 4- CORRECT
FATHERS NAME OF RES.NO. 1 AS PER CPg:9 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

60. MA 1661/2013 KIRTI KUMAR SINGH ANURUDHA P. SINGH
Versus
BRAJBHAN SAUNDHIA
IN DEFAULT OF 1. FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTAINABILITY
AS COPY OF DEPOSIT RECEIPT HAS NOT BEEN FILED U/S 173 OF M.V. ACT.
AND ALSO FOR ORDERS ON THE DEFAULT 2- DEFICIT C.F. OF RS. 10/- ON
C.C. OF AWARD AND RS. 5/- ON APPEAL RESPECTIVELY.

61. MA 1663/2013 SHIVDHANI @ RAMDHANI KAPIL PATWARDHAN
SMT. SHOBHNA KOSHTA
Versus
LALLAN PAL
IN DEFAULT OF 1. DEFICIT C.F. 2.5% OF ENHANCED AMOUNT.
.

62. MA 1666/2013 LALITA BAI VIPIN SHARMA
Versus
DEVAN SINGH
IN DEFAULT OF 1. DEFICIT C.F. 2.5% OF ENHANCED AMOUNT.
.

63. MA 1667/2013 MITHUN UIKE NARESH SHARMA
PRADEEP K. PATEL
Versus
GENDRAM MASRAM
IN DEFAULT OF 1. FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTATINABILITY
AS COPY OF DEPOSITE RECEIPT HAS NOT BEEN FILED U/S 173 OF M.V.
ACT . AND ALSO FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF NO. 2 . TRIBUNAL CLAIM AMOUNT
NOT MENTIONED ON THE APPEAL. 3. LEGIBLE COPY OF PG. NO. 11(BACK
PORTION ) 4. CORRECT VALAUTION OF THE APPEAL. 5. CLAIM CASE NO.
IS IN-CORRECT IN PARA IX OF THE APPEAL. 6. NAME WITH COMPLETE PARTICULARS
OF APPELLANT NO. 2 ON THE VAKALATNAMA.

64. MA 1669/2013 MITHUN UIKE NARESH SHARMA
PRADEEP KUMAR PATEL
Versus
SHRICHAND KOVACHE
IN DEFAULT OF 1. FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTATINABILITY
AS COPY OF DEPOSITE RECEIPT HAS NOT BEEN FILED U/S 173 OF M.V.
ACT . AND ALSO FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF NO. 2 . TRIBUNAL CLAIM AMOUNT
NOT MENTIONED ON THE APPEAL. 3. LEGIBLE COPY OF PG. NO. 11(BACK
PORTION ) 4. CORRECT VALAUTION OF THE APPEAL. 5. NAME WITH COMPLETE
PARTICULARS OF APPELLANT NO. 2 ON THE VAKALATNAMA. 6. BLANK SPACE
HAS BEEN LEFT IN PARA 2,3 AND 4 OF DELAY APPLICATION.

65. MA 1670/2013 ASHISH RAJAK R. SINGH
ARVIND PATHAK
Versus
SATENDRA SINGH THAKUR
IN DEFAULT OF 1. DEFICIT C.F. 2.5% OF ENHANCED AMOUNT.
.

66. MA 1671/2013 GOLDI JAIN @ NARENDRA JAIN VISHAL DHAGAT
NEERAJ PATHAK
Pg:10 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
SANTOSH CHOUDHARI (SILAVAT)
IN DEFAULT OF 1. FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTAINABILITY
AS COPY OF DEPOSITE RECEIPT HAS NOT BEEN FILED U/S 173 OF M.V.
ACT. AND ALSO FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF NO. 2. CERTIFIED COPY OF AWARD
DT. 16/10/12 ALONG WITH C.F. WORTH RS. 10/- ON THE SAME. 3. DEFICIT
C.F. WORTH RS. 30/- ON THE APPEAL AND COMPLETE SET OF C.F. ON THE
VAKALATNAMA. 4. CORRECT VALUATION OF THE APPEAL . 5. SIGNATURE
OF THE APPELLANT WITH COMPLETE PARTICULARS ON THE VAKALATNAMA.
NOTE- LIMITATION HAS BEEN CALCULATED ON THE BASIS OF PHOTO COPY
OF AWARD.

67. MA 1672/2013 ASHARAM NARESH SHARMA
PRADEEP K. PATEL
Versus
SHAFEEQ KHAN
IN DEFAULT OF 1. VALUATION OF THE APPEAL. 2. IDENTIFICATION OF
THUMB IMPRESSION ON THE VAKALATNAMA WITH COMPLETE ADDRESS.

68. MA 1673/2013 GOLDI JAIN @ NARENDRA JAIN VISHAL DHAGAT
NEERAJ PATHAK
Versus
MULAM SINGH
IN DEFAULT OF 1. FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTAINABILITY
AS COPY OF DEPOSITE RECEIPT HAS NOT BEEN FILED U/S 173 OF M.V.
ACT. AND ALSO FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF NO. 2. DEFICIT C.F. WORTH
RS. 30/- ON THE APPEAL,RS.10/- C.C C.F. ON THE VAKALATNAMA. 3. CORRECT VALUATION OF THE APPEAL. 4.
SIGNATURE OF THE APPELLANT ON THE VAKALATNAMA.

69. MA 1674/2013 SUDHIR RAWAT ARUN KUMAR CHOUBEY
JAGTENDRA PRASAD, SHARAD PANDEY
Versus
SMT. MANJU RAW2AT
IN DEFAULT OF 1.IDENTIFICATION ON AN AFFIDAVIT WHICH HAS BEEN SUPPORTED
BY DELAY APPLICATION. 2. DATE OF EXECUTION ON THE VAKALATNAMA.

70. MA 1675/2013 SONU RAJAK R. SINGH
ARVIND PATHAK,
Versus
SATENDRA SINGH THAKUR
IN DEFAULT OF 1. DEFICIT C.F. 2.5% OF ENHANCED AMOUNT.
.

71. MA 1678/2013 NILESH RAJAK R. SINGH
ARVIND PATHAK, PRIYATOSH BAJPAI, MAHENDRA TIWARI
Versus
SATENDRA SINGH THAKUR
IN DEFAULT OF 1. DEFICIT C.F. WORTH RS. 2.5% OF ENHANCED AMOUNT.

72. MA 1691/2013 MANOJ KUMAR JAIN SIDDHARTH PATEL
Versus
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMP. LTD.
Pg:11 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN DEFAULT OF 1. FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTAINABILITY
AS COPY OF DEPOSITE RECEIPT HAS NOT BEEN FILED U/S 173 OF M.V.
ACT. AND ALSO FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF NO. 2. TYPED COPY OF PG. NO.

18.TO 21 ( HAND-WRITTEN P0RTION). 3. PG.NOS. ON THE LIST OF DOCUMENTS
PG.

73. MA 1694/2013 SMT. SUNITA MARAVI SHANKAR PRASAD SINGH
NEETU PRAJAPATI
Versus
SOPAN
IN DEFAULT OF 1. DEFICIT C.F. 2.5% OF ENHANCED AMOUNT. 2. CLAIM
CASE NO. IS IN-CORRECT IN PARA 1(A) OF THE APPEAL.

74. FA 390/2013 DURGA PRASAD PRADEEP NAVERIYA
SANJAY SONI, AJAY SEN, VERSHA KOTHARI
Versus
MAHESH KUMAR
IN DEFAULT OF 1.RS 20/.ON POWER 2.RS 25/.ON I.A. 3.C.F.OF RS 15,000/.

4.RS 10/.ON C.C.OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER.

75. FA 391/2013 KAILASH MEHTA @ KAILASH MEHTO DEEPAK PANJWANI
RAJESH PANJWANI
Versus
SMT. MUNNI BAI MEHTO
IN DEFAULT OF (1) VALUATION OF APPEAL UNDER DIFFERENT HEADS AND
DETAILS OF REQUISITE COURT FEE NOT PROVIDED.

76. FA 394/2013 JAGPRASAD YADAV RANJAN BANERJEE
S.P. VERMA, V.K. PANDEY, SMT. SARITA KANOJIA
Versus
DEVI DAYAL KHARE (DECEASED) TH:LRS IN DEFAULT OF (1) VALUATION OF APPEAL UNDER DIFFERENT HEADS AND
DETAILS OF REQUISITE COURT FEE NOT PROVIDED.

77. FA 396/2013 RAMYASH CHATURVEDI PRANAY VERMA
KAUSTUBH S. JHA
Versus
NIRMALA SINGH
IN DEFAULT OF 1.SIGN OF COUNSEL ON INDEX. 2.RS 20/.ON POWER 3.RS
10/.ON C.C.OF IMUGNED ORDER 4.SECOND SET INCOMPLETE 5.INCORRECT
VALUATION AND C.F.ACCORDINGLY.IT IS 1 LAKH INSTEAD OF 10 LAKH.

78. SA 849/2001 GANGADHARI AND ORS SUYASH TRIPATHI,TD.PANDEY,R.SHUKLA
Versus
DILMAN AND ORS
[FOR DEFAULT OF NOT FILING P.F. R.NO. 2 STATE OF M.P.) REGD.A.D.ON
I.A. NO. 12305/2012, 12311/2012,12307/2012,12336/2012,AND 4580/2013.

79. MCC 690/2013 KAMALCHAND SHASHANK UPADHYAY
KAMLESH MISHRA
Versus
THE LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION OFFICER ADVOCATE GENERAL
Pg:12 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

80. MCC 691/2013 PRAKASH KUMAR DUBEY SHASHANK UPADHYAY
KAMLESH MISHRA
Versus
THE LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION OFFICER ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF COMPLETE PARTICULARS OF RESP.NO.1,3 AND 4.
.

81. MCC 692/2013 CANTONMENT BOARD JABALPUR J.P. PANDEY
VIJAY SINGH, VIJAY SINGH THAKUR
Versus
M/S SALIGRAM AND CO.
IN DEFAULT OF (1) ADVANCE COPY NOT SUPPLIED TO RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS.
(2) C.F. OF RS.20/- ON POWER.

82. MCC 693/2013 DWARKA PRASAD SHASHANK UPADHYAY
KAMLESH MISHRA
Versus
THE LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION OFFICER ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF COMPLETE PARTICULRS OF RESP.NO.1 AND 3.
.

83. MCC 694/2013 JANKI PRASAD SHASHANK UPADHYAY
KAMLESH MISHRA
Versus
THE LAND ACQUISITION NAD REHABILITATION OFFICER ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF COMPLETE PARTICULARS OF RESP.NO.1 AND 3.
.

84. MCC 695/2013 SMT. VIDYA MISHRA ARUBENDRA SINGH
BINOD TIWARI, ANOOP MISHRA, DINESH MISHRA
Versus
SMT. SUSHILA SINGH
IN DEFAULT OF (1) APPLICATION U/S
5.LIMITATION ACT IN TIME BARRED
CASES NOT FILED.

85. MCC 697/2013 SMT. KIRAN MISHRA RAMSUPHAL CHATURVEDI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF INDEX NOT FILED.
.

86. MCC 698/2013 SMT. REETA JAIN R.S. PATEL
OMPRAKASH RATHORE, JAGDISH SINGROL
Versus
MANOJ KUMAR JAIN
IN DEFAULT OF (1) NON ATTESTATION OF TYPED COPY OF DOCUMENTS BY
THE COUSEL AS A TRUE COPIES.

87. MCC 700/2013 NARAYAN RAO HEMANT BHANNARWAR
GOPAL SHRIVAS
Versus
RAMDATTA
(1) ADVANCE COPY NOT SUPPLIED TO SHRI SAMEER SETH, ADVOCATE WHO
APPEARED IN IN DEFAULT OF C.R.NO.453/2004. (2) AGE OF RESP.NO.2(A)
Pg:13 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSSE TITLE.

88. MCC 704/2013 MUSTAQUIM DINESH UPADHYAY
MANISH TRIVEDI, ASHISH UPADHYAY
Versus
SHRI TULSI RAM
IN DEFAULT OF (1) ADVANCE COPY NOT SUPPLIED TO SHRI G.S.AHLUWALIA,
ADVOCATE WHO APPEARED IN M.A.NO.600/2013.
(2) APPLICATION U/S 5 LIMITATION ACT IN TIME BARRED CASES NOT FILED.

89. CRA 1550/2002 AJIT DUBEY SANJAY SHARMA,SMT.DURGESH GUAPTA
RAJESH PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ORDERS ON I.A.11515/2013 FOR PERMISSION TO ARGUE THE APPEAL)

90. CRA 1769/2005 SANTRAM RATHORE SANJAY PATEL,VISHWAS AWASTHI,JAFAR KHAN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON NON-APPEARANCE OF THE ACCUSED/APPELLANTS ON 02/05/13]W/R

91. CRA 798/2006 RAMKUMAR YK.GUPTA
A.USMANI,SADULLA HUSSAIN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
[FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT NO. 2 (MOHAN) ON 10-5-13]
W/R

92. CRA 2538/2007 M.P.STATE ELECTRITY BOARD MUKESH KUMAR AGRAWAL
RAM NARESH
B.P.MISHRA
Versus
RAJMANI PATEL A.G.,R.S.VERMA
MANOJ KUSHWAHA
P.SINGH
[FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/RESPDT. ON 02/05/13] W/R
.

93. CRA 1204/2008 DILIP SINGH SHASHANK UPADHYAY,CS.JHARIYA,VIKASH JYOTSHI
NARENDRA PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
[FOR ORDERS ON NON APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT ON 02/05/2013
W/R

94. CRA 263/2009 SURESH @ VIJAYLAL B.P. GUPTA,PRAKASH GUPTA
KAPIL SINGH,R.KORI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT ON 11-3-13] W/R
.

95. CRA 568/2009 KALLU @ ISHATAQ NARENDRA NIKHARE,TARUN KUMAR,JAYRAJ DISORIA
Versus
Pg:14 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON NON-APPEARANCE OF ACC./APPLT. ON 18/03/2013 AND
IA NO.6932/13 (AT A) FOR CONDONATION OF NON-APPEARANCE.]

96. CRA 1776/2009 THAKURDIN SAKET BINOD TIWARI,RAJESH PANDEY
SANTOSH MISHRA, ANOOP MISHRA, PUSHPRAJ PANDEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON APPEARANCE OF APPELLANT ON 02/05/13] W/R
.

97. CRA 104/2010 PAPPU @ PARSHOTTAM DAS BAIRAGI AMIT JAIN
SANGEETA UMATHE
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT ON 09/05/2013]
.

98. CRA 141/2010 MONU @ RAJESH BURMAN ABHAY GUPTA
R.N.SHUKLA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF ACC./APPLT. ON 17/05/2013]
.

99. CRA 1864/2010 SANTOSH Z.M.SHAH
J.A.SHAH, NITIN SARAF, SANDEEP KOSHTA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT ON 19/3/2013]
.

100. CRA 1977/2010 GANESH PRAMOD THAKRE
SUDEEP PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT NO.1[GANESH])ON 18/03/2013
AND IA 6756/2013 FOR CONDONATION OF NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT
NO. 1[GANESH] ON 18/03/2013[A] W/R

101. CRA 2098/2010 PARSOTTAM PATHAK ASHISH SINHA
SURAJ SINGH, ROHIT DUBEY, SMT.RASHMI RANA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANTS ON 02/05/13]
W/R

102. CRA 2137/2010 MUNNALAL R.P.PRAJAPATI
NARESH SHARMA, SMT.S.NAIDU, S.RAJAK
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF APPELLANT NO. 4 ON 16/4/2013)W/R
.

103. CRA 2178/2010 OWAIS KHAN KHALID NOOR FAKHRUDDIN
SABA FAKHRUDDIN, A.R.KHAN
Versus
Pg:15 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON APPEARANCE OF APPELLANT ON 30/4/13 AND ON I.A. NO. 9980/13
FOR EXEMPTION FOR APPEARANCE ON 30/4/13\\\\\\\'] W/R

104. CRA 487/2011 RAM GOPAL V.K.RISHI
ABHISHEK RISHI, GOURAV, R.BEGUM
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON APPEARANCAE OF THE ACCUSED/APPELLANT ON 07/05/2013]
.

105. CRA 1441/2011 HIRA LAL NARESH SHARMA
DEVESH KHATRI, PRADEEP PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/ APPELLANT ON 7.5.13]
WR

106. CRA 2609/2011 ASHOK VERMA AMIT MISHRA
S KHAN, SHAHID KHAN, R ALI, D DWIVEDI, R SONI,
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON APPERANCE OF APPELLANTS NO. 2 AND 3 ON 30/04/13) ]W/R
.

107. CRA 2621/2011 UMESH ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA
SMT.NEELIMA GUPTA, DEEPAK TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT ON 06/05/13] W/R
.

108. CRA 1068/2012 RAVI @ RAVINANDAN H.S. VERMA
P.N.VERMA,AJAY PAL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/ APPELLANT ON 9.5.13]WR

109. CRA 1220/2012 AVDHESH SOLANKI B.R.VIJAYWAR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ORDER ON NON APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELANT ON 6/3/2013 ]
.

110. MCRC 2653/2013 PAPPU PAL RANJAN BANERJEE
SP.VERMA,VK.PANDEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
KUNDAN LAL PRAJAPATI, VA ANSARI(OBJECTOR)
( FOR IA NO.12959/2013 FOR CHANGE OF COUNCIL )
.

111. MCRC 6140/2013 TATAR @ CHATURNARAYAN AJAY SHUKLA
RAJNISH CHOUBEY,RS.DUBEY,ANSHUL MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-CERTIFIED COPY OR PHOTOCOPY OF REJECTION ORDER OF
Pg:16 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOWER COURT]

112. MCRC 6563/2013 AJMER SINGH SIDDHARTH DATT
DATT N.ASSOCIATES
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-TYPED COPY OF ANNEX.A-1 AND ANNEX.A-2 AND A-3 NOT FILED]
WITH

113. MCRC 6537/2013 AJMER SINGH NARENDRA NIKHARE
TARUN KUMAR ROHTAS,AJAY KUMAR DUBEY,PRAMOD PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[1.P.S. NOT TELLY WITH PREVIOUS BAIL. 2.DATE OF ARREST NOT MENTIONED.

3.DATE OF APPLICATION NOT MENTIONED IN PARTICULRS OF EARLIER BAIL.

4.TYPED COPY OF ANNEXURE A/2]

114. MCRC 7215/2013 KAINHAIYA LAL RAJKAMAL CHATURVEDI
MOHIT NAMDEO
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-(1) NAME OF APPLICANT NO. 1 MENTION ON CAUSE TITLE
AND AFFIDAVIT NOT TALLY WITH IMPUGNED ORDER. (2) DATE OF ORDER DT.
31/05/2013 MENTION ON PARTICULARS OF IMPUGNED ORDER NOT TALLY WITH
IMPUGNED ORDER. (3) TYPE COPY OF ANNEX. A-2 NOT FILED]

115. MCRC 7326/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SINGH GHANSHYAM SHARMA
DEEPAK NEMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-DEFICIT OF RS. 10/- ON MEMO OF APPEARANCE]
.

116. MCRC 7328/2013 RAJU @ SANJEEV SHARMA KULDEEP SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-INCORRECT BAIL APPLICATION NO. MENTIONED IN PARTICULARS
OF IMPUGNED ORDER]

117. MCRC 7330/2013 HARDAS AHIRWAR ANOOP SAXENA
ALPANA SAXENA,CHHOTI KUSHRAM
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-TYPED COPY OF HANDWRITTEN MATTER OF ANNEXURE A-2]

118. MCRC 7344/2013 JAGDISH YADAV SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH
AKHIL SINGH,SATENDRA SINGH TIWARI,MANISH DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-NAME OF THE JUDGE NOT MENTIONED IN PARTICULARS OF
ORDER IMPUGNED]

119. MCRC 7347/2013 KAILASH YADAV NARENDRA NIKHARE
Pg:17 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TARUN KUMAR ROHTAS,AJAY KUMAR DUBEY,PRAMOD PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-OFFENCES NOT TALLY WITH ORDER IMPUGNED]
.

120. MCRC 7354/2013 MANOHARLAL RATHORE DEEPCHAND YADAV,SATYAM AGRAWAL
YADVENDRA YADAV
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-INCOMPLETE INDEX]
.

121. MCRC 7355/2013 ANIL CHOURASIYA UMESH VAIDYA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-[1] FATHERS NAME OF APPLICANT MENTIONED IN CAUSE
TITLE OF PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT NOT TALLY WITH IMPUGNED ORDER]

122. MCRC 7356/2013 NARENDRA SATYAM AGRAWAL
SHIVAM AGRAWAL,SHIVRAJ KUSHWAHA,RAHUL GUPTA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-[1] CRIME NO. SEEMS TO BE WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARTICULARS
OF CRIME ( I.E. CRIMNAL CASE NO.)]

123. CRR 583/2005 ASHOK KUMAR JAIN PK.ASATI,ADITYA SHARMA,SANJAY JAIN
Versus
UTTAM CHAND JAIN AND ORS. ADVOCATE GENERAL
VIVEK SONI, C.K.CHAKRAWARTI [1]
WAJID HYDER, NASIR AHMED, MANISH UPADHYAY,
SATYENDRA JAIN, AMIT PANDEY [1]
[FOR DEFAULT OF NON APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/RESP.NO.1 UTTAM CHAND
JAIN AND NO.2 SHILA BAI ON 09/04/2
013.AND IA NO. 8271/13 FOR EXEMPTION
FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF R.NO.1AND 2 ON 9/04/13]W/R

124. CRR 1498/2009 MOHAN SUSHIL TIWARI
RAVENDRA TIWARI, RAKESH GAUTAM
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR NON APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPLICANT NO. 3(KISHORI) ON 04/04/2013]

125. CRR 747/2010 BISRAM MANISH BILLORE
RAVINDRA BISEN
MANOJ RAJAK [2]
RAVINDRA BISEN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT OF NON APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPLICANT NO.1 BISRAM
AND NO.2 ANWAR KHAN ON 330/03/2013 AND ALSO ON IA NO. 7431/13 FOR CONDONATION
OF NON APPEARANCE DT.30/03/2013 [29/03/13]W/R

126. CRR 1892/2011 VYASMUNI K.K. GAUTAM
Versus
Pg:18 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDER ON IA NO. 346/2013 FOR CONDONATION OF NON-APPEARANCE
OF THE APPLICANT NO.1 (VYAS MUNI) ON 19/12/12.

127. CRR 1974/2011 KRISHNA KUMAR MANISH GAVANE
AD MISHRA
A.D.MISHRA,SUMIT KANOJIYA,ASHISH KUMAR GUPTA(1 DAY
C.B.SINGH, BALDEV PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR NON APPEARENCE OF ACCUSED APPLICANT KISHAN KUMAR ON 4/4/13
.

128. CRR 811/2012 IQBAL @ ALLARAKHA S.D.KHAN
N.K.MISHRA,MOHD.RASHEED
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON NON APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/ APPLICANT (IQBAL) ON
08/04/2013]

129. CRR 743/2013 SNEHLATA GUPTA AMIT VERMA
AJAY MISHRA, SMITA KAPOOR
Versus
VIVEK CHANDRA GUPTA @ RAJU
[FOR ORDERS ON DEFAULT OF NOT PAYMENT OF PF FOR RAD MODE.
.

130. CONC 791/2013 AVADHLAL SINGH BAHELIYA SUDHANSHU KUMAR SINGH
DINANATH TRIPATHI
Versus
SHRI ASHISH UPADHYAY ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR DEFAULT OF PF. OF RESPONDENT NO. 1 AND 2 BY R.A.D.
.

131. CONC 1132/2013 SIYARAM SHARAN PANDEY RAVENDRA SHUKLA
S.K. DUBEY
Versus
SHRI S.N. RUPLA ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER ON THE POWER
.

132. CONC 1133/2013 ANIL KUMAR KACHI SHAILESH TIWARI
ANIL UPADHYAY
DEEPALI TIWARI, POONAM DAHARWAL
Versus
MRS. ARUNA SHARMA, I.A.S. ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER IN CONTEMPT
PETITIONS NOT FILED.(LIMITATION WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER FILING
OF CERTIFIED COPY)
(2) NO DECLARATION AS PER R-14 CH
10.OF M.P.HIGH COURT RULES (3)
TYPED COPY OF ANNEXURE C/2

133. CONC 1134/2013 SHYAM LAL VISHWAKARMA RAVENDRA SHUKLA
S.K.DUBEY
Versus
SHRI S.N. RUPTA ADVOCATE GENERAL
Pg:19 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN DEFAULT OF EXECUTION DATE ON THE POWER
.

134. CONC 1137/2013 GAGAN GUPTA B.CHOURASIYA, NEELESH AWASTHI
Versus
SHRI M.G.CHOUBEY
IN DEFAULT OF (1) CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER IN CONTEMPT
PETITIONS NOT FILED.(LIMITATION WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER FILING
OF CERTIFIED COPY)

135. CONC 1141/2013 VIRENDRANATH RAI RAJENDRA PANDEY
ANAND KUMAR VERMA
Versus
SHRI VIVEK PORWAL ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) NO DECLARATION AS PER R-14 CH 10 OF M.P.HIGH
COURT RULES

136. CONC 1142/2013 RAJIV NIGAM ABHIJEET A. AWASTHI
ANURITA AWASTHI SHUKLA, NIRNAY GUPTA,SHREYAS DUBEY
Versus
SHRI S.P.S. PARIHAR ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) REQUIRED COURT FEE ON THE PETITION, POWER AND ALSO
A.K.N STAMPS RS. 50/- ON THE POWER (2) LEGIBLE COPY OF PAGE NO.
14,20 (3) CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER IN CONTEMPT PETITIONS
NOT FILED.(LIMITATION WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER FILING OF CERTIFIED
COPY) (4) ADVANCE COPY NOT SERVED TO RESPONDENT NO. 1

137. CONC 1143/2013 PARITISHA DEVI KUSHWAHA H. DWIVEDI
Versus
INDRANEEL SHANKAR DANI ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER IN CONTEMPT
PETITIONS NOT FILED.(LIMITATION WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER FILING
OF CERTIFIED COPY) (2) TYPED COPY OF PAGE NO. 7,8,9 (3) ANNEXURES
ARE NOT ATTESTED AS A TRUE COPY (4) REQUIRED COURT FEE ON THE PETITION,
POWER AND ALSO A.K.N. STAMPS RS. 50/-

138. CONC 1144/2013 GYANENDRA PANDEY J.L. SONI
LAVKUSH MISHRA
Versus
SHRI INDRANEEL DANI ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF ADDRESS OF COUNSEL ON THE POWER
.

139. CONC 1145/2013 PRAHLAD KUMAR BAGHEL PRABHAKAR SINGH
ATUL SINGH GAHARWAR
Versus
SHRI R.S. JULANIA ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF TION IN THE INDEX AND LIST OF DOCUMENT (2) IN-COMPLETE
PAGING IN THE INDEX AND LIST OF DOCUMENT

140. CONC 1146/2013 ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
RAHUL MISHRA, R.K. TIWARI
Versus
Pg:20 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHRI R.S. JULANIA ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) SIGNATURE OF COUNSEL ON THE INDEX, PETITION AND
POWER (2) COMPLETE PARTICULARS OF RESPONDENT NO. 2 ON THE PETITION

141. CONC 1147/2013 SMT. SANDHYA KARMARKAR SANJAYRAM TAMRAKAR
VINOD KUMAR MISHRA, GHANSHYAM BARMAN
Versus
SHRI SANJAY SINGH ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED IN W.P.(S)
4002/2005 NOT FILED (LIMITATION WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER FILING
C.C.OF IMPUGNED ORDER

142. CONC 1148/2013 DR. MUMTAZ JAHAN KHAN VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
R.K. TIWARI, RAHUL MISHRA
Versus
G.R. SHARMA ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER IN CONTEMPT
PETITIONS NOT FILED.(LIMITATION WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER FILING
OF CERTIFIED COPY)

143. CONC 1151/2013 BHASKAR PRASAD NIGAM VIDYA PRASAD KUSHWAHA
RAMCHANDRA , SMT. UPMA TIWARI
Versus
SANJAY SINGH ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) ANNEXURE C/2,C/3 AND C/4 ARE NOT ATTESTED AS A
TRUE COPY (2) ADVANCE COPY NOT SERVED TO RESPONDENT (3) AN APPLICATION
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY AS TIME BARRED BY 82 DAYS

144. CONC 1153/2013 SURENDRA KUMAR GOUR SANJAYRAM TAMRAKAR
VINOD MISHRA
Versus
SHRI SANJAY SINGH ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF DEFICIT C.F.RS.25/- ON THE PETITION
.

145. CONC 1154/2013 SMT. SAVITRI AGNIHOTRI SANJAYRAM TAMRAKAR
VINOD MISHRA, G.S. BARMAN
Versus
SHRI SANJAY SINGH ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF IN-CORRECT PAGING FROM PAGE NO. 16 AS PER INDEX (NOTE
: IT IS TIME BARRED BY 7 YEARS AND
83.DAYS)

146. CONC 1155/2013 CHHAYA CHOUBEY B.P. SHARMA
AMIT KUMAR SHARMA, SHOBHNA SHARMA, ARPIT TIWARI
Versus
R.P. DIVEDI
IN DEFAULT OF (1) ADVANCE COPY NOT SERVED TO RESPONDENT (2) IN-COMPLETE
PROVISION ON THE TITLE PAGE OF THE PETITION (3) AN APPLICATION
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY AS TIME BARRED BY 67 DAYS

147. CONC 1156/2013 SMT. ASHA MISHRA HEMANT BHANNARWAR
GOPAL SHRIVAS, NEELESH JAIN
Versus
Pg:21 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASHISH UPADHAYAY ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER IN CONTEMPT
PETITIONS NOT FILED.(LIMITATION WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER FILING
OF CERTIFIED COPY) (2) TYPED COPY OF ANNEXURE C/2

148. CONC 1157/2013 RAM PRAGRAS FAIYAZ KHAN
Versus
RAMDEEN
IN DEFAULT OF PAGING IN THE LIST OF DOCUMENTS
.

149. CONC 1158/2013 BRIJ KISHORE NAPIT RAJKUMAR TRIPATHI
Versus
SHRI S.N. ROOPLA ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF AN APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY AS TIME BARRED
BY 87 DAYS

150. CONC 1159/2013 RAMESH KUMAR SHARMA K.K. VERMA
ANUJ SINGH, RAMESH MISHRA
Versus
R.G. SHILPKAR
IN DEFAULT OF ADVANCE COPY NOT SERVED TO RESPONDENT
.

151. CONC 1160/2013 RAM MILAN KORI SMT. SONALI SHRIVASTAVA
H.R. BHARTI
Versus
SHRI A.K. SINGH ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER IN CONTEMPT
PETITIONS NOT FILED.(LIMITATION WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER FILING
OF CERTIFIED COPY)
(2)NO DECLARATION AS PER R-14 CH 10.OF M.P.HIGH COURT RULES (3)
ANNEXURE C/1 (PAGE NO. 7) NOT FILED AS MENTION IN THE INDEX (3)
COMPLETE PROVISION OF LAW ON THE TITLE PAGE OF THE PETITION

152. CONC 1163/2013 MUKESH KUMAR DUBEY D.K.DIXIT
ANSHUL DIXIT, SHAILESH JAIN
Versus
R.S.ZULANIYA ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER IN CONTEMPT
PETITIONS NOT FILED.(LIMITATION WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER FILING
OF CERTIFIED COPY)

153. RP 447/2013 RAMVISHAL GUPTA ANOOP SAXENA
ALPANA SAXENA, CHHOTI KUSRAM
Versus
RAMGOPAL GUPTA ADVOCATE GENERAL
J.L. SONI [R1 TO R4]
IN DEFAULT OF (1) NON ATTESTATION OF THE DOCUMENTS BY THE NOTARY/OATH
COMMISSIONER. (2) INDEX NOT FILED. (3) CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS NOT
FILED. (4) LIST OF DOCUMENTS NOT FILED. (5) APPLICATION U/S 5 LIMITATION
ACT IN TIME BARRED CASES NOT FILED
154. RP 449/2013 YAYATI ASSEEM @ DAMMU R.K.SANGHI
Pg:22 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MO. FIROZ, SHOBHIT SINGH
Versus
SHYAMDAS CHANSORIA
IN DEFAULT OF (1) NON ATTESTATION OF THE DOCUMENTS BY THE NOTARY/OATH
COMMISSIONER. (2) AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED.

155. RP 460/2013 THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED MISS ANJALI BANERJEE
SANDEEP KUMAR DUBEY
Versus
RAM KRISHAN PATEL
IN DEFAULT OF (1) LEGIBLE COPIES OF HAND-WRITTEN DOCUMENTS PAGE
NO.8 NOT FILED.
(2) UNDER-LINING OF HIGHLIGHTING THE PORTION IN PAGE NO.12,13,14,15,16,17.
(3) ADVANCE COPY OF PETITION NOT SUPPLIED TO SHRI D.N.SHUKLA, ADVOCATE
WHO APPEARED IN M.A.NO.2511/2010.

156. RP 464/2013 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COM.LTD SHAILENDRA SAMAIYA
VIKAS JAIN
Versus
SMT. GAYATRI SINGH PRAMOD THAKRE [R1 TO R5]
IN DEFAULT OF (1) ADVANCE COPY NOT SUPPLIED TO SHRI RAJESH SEN,
ADVOCATE AND SHRI RAKESH JAIN, ADVOCATE WHO APPEARED IN M.A.NO.1485/2011.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1d1872000
01.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( IV )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. SOLANKI
COURT ROOM NO.: 13
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[PERSONAL APPEARANCE CASES]
.

1. CRA 183/1996 GAFLU AND ORS. MASOOD ALI /
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR PRESENCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANTS AND ALSO FOR PRESENCE OF SURETY
OF ACCUSED/APPELLANTS]W/R FD

2. CRA 387/2008 PREETAM ZM.SHAH,JA.SHAH,N.SARAF
NARENDRA NIKHARE
SANDEEP KOSHTA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
[FOR APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT AND SURETY.] W/R FD
.

3. CRA 2165/2010 NISAAR ALI @ VIKKI PRADEEP NAVERIYA
SANJAY SONI, AJAY SEN, VARSHA KOTHARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR PRESNCE OF APPELLANT)W/R FD
.
[FIXED DATE CASES]
.

4. CRA 905/2003 BHEEKAM @ RAJA AND ANR. HARI SHANKER DUBEY,A.DUBEY,S.BEOHAR
A.D.MISHRA,K.L.PRAJAPATI [APPELLANT 2]
A.D.MISHRA [CHANGE COUNSEL]
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. AG.
[FOR PRESENCE OF THE ACCUSED/APPELLANT NO. 2 [LAKHANLAL] AND SURETY
] W/R

5. CRA 1207/2009 JAVED KHAN M.B.SHRIVASTAVA
GEETA YADAV [APPELANT NO.2]
ASHOK CHAKRAVARTY,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV, SMT.
JITESH SHRIVASTAVA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR FURTHER ORDERS AND FOR ORDERS ON IA.NO. 6460/2013 FOR GRANT
OF BAIL OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT NO. 2 (SANDESH @ PAPPU) AT FLAG 'A'
] W/R
[MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS]
.

6. CRA 1961/2010 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
Versus
SURESH PRASAD @ PAPPU SONI PARITOSH TRIVEDI
[ FOR ODERS ON REPORT RECEIVED FROM A/G THE ACCUSED/APPELLANT HE
IS CONFINED IN DISTT. JAIL SHAHDOL[A] ALSO FOR FURTHER ORDERS W/R[F.D.]
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1d1874000
01.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( V )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N.K. GUPTA
COURT ROOM NO.: 14
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[FIXED DATE CASES]
.

1. FA 972/2005 M/S VIMAL ENTERPRISES ARUN KUMAR CHOUBEY,JAGATENDRA PRASAD
Versus
HARI UNIYAL LT.GENRAL RC.SHRIVASTAVA,SAJID AKHTAR,KANAK GAHARWAR,
VIVEK RUSIA, U.S.RAWAT[R1 TO 3]
TERENCE BURROWS(R.1 TO 3)
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE
.
[FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE]
.

2. FA 212/2007 SMT.ARCHANA TRIPATHI PUSHPRAJ SINGH GAHARWAR,US.JAISWAL
Versus
CHANDRAKANT TRIPATHI LAVKUSH MISHRA(1)
[FOR FINAL HEARING OF THE AT MOTION STAGE]
.

3. CR 493/2011 SMT. REKHA CHOUDHARY P. D. GUPTA
S.D. MISHRA
Versus
SMT. SUMAN AHIRWAR RAJESH CHAND, S.K.DUBEY, JITENDRA JAIN,
ANJANA KURARIYA, ANURAG SINGH (1)
FOR FINAL DISPOSAL IN MOTION HEARING STAGE (W/C.)LINK WITH CR.275/12,
CR.485/11(D.D.) AND CR.482/11(D.D.)(ENSUING AFTER SUMMER VACATION)
WITH

4. CR 275/2012 SMT. PREMBAI AHIRWAR SAMDARSHI TIWARI
PRANAY CHOUBEY, NAVENDRA CHOUDHARY
Versus
SMT. SUMAN AHIRWAR ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR FINAL DISPOSAL IN MOTION HEARING STAGE
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1d1875000
01.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( VI )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE VIMLA JAIN
COURT ROOM NO.: 8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[FIXED DATE CASES]
.

1. MA 1696/2013 ICICI LOMBARD GIC LTD SANKALP KOCHAR
V.MISHRA, S.K.DIXIT, S.PANDEY
Versus
SMT. SUKHIYA BAI
(FOR ADMISSION AND ORDERS ON IA NO.
[FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE]
.

2. MA 2387/2006 MUNNALAL PATEL SHANKER PRASAD SINGH
Versus
DR.SUBHASH SINGHAI KN.AGARWAL,DINESH AGRAWAL,S.AGRAWAL
P.GUPTA
[FOR FINAL HEARING AT MOTION STAGE]
.

3. MA 3423/2008 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. JAYANT NEEKHRA
Versus
SMT. RAJANI SAHU SUDESH K MISHRA,K.SHARMA[1-5],VISHAL DHAGAT,
AWDESH SINGH[1-5]
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL IN MOTION STAGE.]
.

4. MA 5599/2008 MOTU @ SHRIRAM KAMAL SINGH RAJPOOT,AK.TIWARI,LJ.KUSHWAHA
Versus
ANMOKHILAL TS. LAMBA, CS. LAMBA, NS. SEN[4]
L.N.SAKLE,SHANKALP KOCHAR,S.K.DIXIT,A.TIWARI
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AND IA NO. 7411/11 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY
IN FILING CROSS OBJECTION AND FURTHER ORDERS ON IA NO. 14234/08
FOR STAY]

5. MA 4543/2010 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. V.K.TRIVEDI
Versus
SMT. SHYAMA RANI KONDAR MRS.DEVIKA SINGH [6]
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE] CO
.
WITH

6. MA 4544/2010 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. V.K.TRIVEDI
Versus
RAMESHWAR KONDAR MRS.DEVIKA SINGH [5]
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.
WITH

7. MA 4545/2010 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMANY LTD. V.K.TRIVEDI
Versus
RAMESHWAR KONDAR MRS.DEVIKA SINGH [3]
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.
WITH

8. MA 4546/2010 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. V.K.TRIVEDI
Versus
PREMA KONDAR MRS.DEVIKA SINGH [7]
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE VIMLA JAIN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.
WITH

9. MA 4547/2010 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD V.K. TRIPATHI
Versus
RAMA KONDAR MRS.DEVIKA SINGH [7]
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.
WITH

10. MA 1472/2012 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. V.K. TRIVEDI
Versus
BALADEEN @ BALU KONDAR
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.

11. MA 527/2012 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COM. LTD. MISS ANJALI BANERJEE
SANDEEP KUMAR DUBEY
Versus
MST. NANDA RAKESH SHARMA, NARENDRA MISHRA, SUDHIR MISHRA[1TO5
[FOR FINAL HEARING AT MOTION STAGE] WR
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1d1879000
01.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( VII )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL
COURT ROOM NO.: 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[FRESH MATTERS] [ BAIL MATTERS]
.

1. MCRC 4758/2013 ASLAM KHAN M. SHAFFIQULLAH
A.HAQUE,MOHD.RIYAZ
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

2. MCRC 6019/2013 RAJNEESH TIWARI SIDDHARTH DATT
DATT N.ASSOCIATES
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

3. MCRC 6055/2013 SUKLESH RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
JEETENDRA SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

4. MCRC 6081/2013 RAJESH CHIKINGAL SIDDHARTH DATT
DATT N.ASSOCIATES
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

5. MCRC 6213/2013 BHAGWANDAS KAMAL SINGH RAJPUT
AK.TIWARI,LALJI KUSHWAHA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

6. MCRC 6503/2013 BHAOSINGH DHAKAD SOURABH BHUSHAN SHRIVASTAVA
PRATYUSH TRIPATHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

7. MCRC 6525/2013 NARAYAN VISHWAS HARI SHANKAR DUBEY
AMIT DUBEY, ABHINAV DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

8. MCRC 6558/2013 CHHUTAN @ CHHOTTELAL RATHORE J.S. SINGH
AK.DUBEY,M.MISHRA,SHIVAM SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

9. MCRC 6637/2013 MAHESH PUSHPENDRA DUBEY
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KAMLESH MISHRA,ANURAG DHANYABAD
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

10. MCRC 6898/2013 SANDEEP @ PINKU CHATURVEDI SUDESH KUMAR MISHRA
SANJAY JHARIA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

11. MCRC 7141/2013 SANTOSH SINGH SIDDHARTH DATT
NISHANT DATT, PUSHPENDRA DUBEY, AJAY MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

12. MCRC 7200/2013 PHOOLCHANDRA @ RAJESH JAISWAL RAMAN PATEL
MAHESH SINGH,VASEEM KHAN
SANGEETA SHARMA,SOMNATH KORI,ARUN PARIHA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

13. MCRC 7289/2013 SANDEEP B. P. GUPTA
PRAKASH GUPTA, SMT.VANDANA GUPTA, G.BAWARIA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

14. MCRC 7343/2013 SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY
ALOK KUMAR,ANIL KUMAR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

15. MCRC 7380/2013 RAJA @ AMIT SONKAR SIDDHARTH DATT
DATT N.ASSOCIATES
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

16. MCRC 7388/2013 VINOD KUMAR SANJAYRAM TAMRAKAR
VINOD MISHRA,GS.BERMAN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

17. MCRC 7389/2013 SURESH KUMAR RAJESH KUMAR PANDEY
ANIL PATEL,HARIKANT VISHWAKARMA,TR.PILLAI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
Pg:3 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FOR ADM.]
.

18. MCRC 7391/2013 RAJA SONKAR R.K. DUBEY
ARVIND YADAV,ASHISH UPADHYAY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

19. MCRC 7395/2013 RAVIN @ GULU O.P. CHOUBEY
P.SHRIVASTAVA,A.SHRIVASTAVA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

20. MCRC 7396/2013 MAHESH KUMAR MRIGENDRA SINGH
ANURAG HAZARI,KAUSTUBH SINGH
AVINASH PATEL,AMIT KHATRI,RANVEER SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

21. MCRC 7399/2013 KAMLESH PATEL A.K. SONI
MANGESH TAMAHANKAR,A.MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

22. MCRC 7401/2013 LAKHAN P.C. PALIWAL
SMT.K.SHARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

23. MCRC 7403/2013 ABHINAV @ RAJU DUBEY SHARAD S. VERMA
ANURAG SHIVHARE,DEEPAK SINGH
LALIT PANDEY,NITIN KARAN,RAKESH DWIVEDI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

24. MCRC 7406/2013 JITENDRA SONKAR GHANSHYAM PANDEY
AJAY SHUKLA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

25. MCRC 7409/2013 VINOD URF BALLU FUZAIL USMANI
SP.TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.
Pg:4 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

26. MCRC 7410/2013 ARJUN SINGH SHARAD S. VERMA
ANURAG SHIVHARE,DEEPAK SINGH
LALIT PANDEY,NITIN KARAN,RAKESH DWIVEDI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

27. MCRC 7422/2013 NARESH KUMAR RAJENDRA GUPTA
AJEET SINGH,RAMCHANDRA,ADITYA N.GUPTA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

28. MCRC 7423/2013 ASHISH KUMAR DUBEY RAJENDRA GUPTA
AJEET SINGH,RAMCHANDRA,ADITYA N.GUPTA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

29. MCRC 7432/2013 JAIRAM INWATI P.S. TIWARI
MANISH TIWARI,ASHISH TIWARI,SMT.ARTI TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

30. MCRC 7434/2013 PRAMOD AMIT JAIN
M.CHOUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.
[AFTER NOTICE MATTERS]
.

31. MCRC 10355/2012 MEHBOOB KHAN RAHUL TRIPATHI
PUSHPENDRA KU.VERMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.

32. MCRC 6779/2013 ASHUTOSH PRAJAPATI ASHUTOSH DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM.]
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1d1882000
01.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( VIII )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KESHAV KUMAR TRIVEDI
COURT ROOM NO.: 9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[HABEAS CORPUS]
.

1. WP 16863/2012(CR) RAKESH MISHRA PRASHANT CHOURASIA
RAJKUMAR YADAV, L.C. CHAURASIA, S.K. GARG
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
SAMDARSHI TIWARI (AG R1 TO R4)
[ FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. ] AND IA NO 3464/13 FOR TAKING PROGRESS
REPORTAND IA NO 4417/13 FOR TQKING PROGRESS REPORT

2. WP 1986/2013(CR) MOHAMMAD USMAN SHEIKH HEMANT SHRIVASTAVA
D.K. MISHRA, RAJEEV MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
(FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. ]
.
[FIXED DATE CASES]
.

3. WP 18633/2010(S) DR. JAYASHREE NANDKARNI BHANU PRATAP YADAV
ANSHUL DIXIT
D.K.DIXIT
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
RAJESH TIWARI G.A.[1AND2]
VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, RK TIWARI(R3)
GUPTA,GAURAV TIWARI [4]
MISHRA ASSOCIATES,PRATYSH TRIPATHI,MUKESH SAHU,R.P
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE] F.D...///
.
WITH

4. WP 5994/2009(S) DR.JAYSHREE NADKARNI BHANU PRATAP YADAV
Versus
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY : DEPTT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION T ADVOCATE GENERAL
SANJAY K AGARWAL, A SETH, RS KUSHWAHA(R3)
KUMARESH PATHAK[1AND2]
D.K. BOHREY, P TRIPATHI, MISHRA ASSOCIATES
[FOR ADM.AND I.A.99280/2009 FOR TAKING ADD.DOC.ON RECORD]
.
WITH

5. WP 1099/2010(S) DR. (SMT.) MANJUSHA GOYAL SANJAY K. AGRAWAL
RAHUL MISHRA, P. BHATNAGAR, R.S. KUSHWAHA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
G.A.(R-1,2)
D.K.DIXIT, ANSHUL SHAILESH JAIN (3)
BHAVE ASSOCIATES,B.P.YADAV(R-3)
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.

6. WP 16800/2011(S) MP OILFED OFFICERS ASSOCIATION SANJEEV TULI
ANUBHAV JAIN
Versus
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KESHAV KUMAR TRIVEDI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
VIJAY SHANKAR PANDEY(R1TOR4)
J.K.PILLAI(R-4,5)
(FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE AND FOR ORDERS ON I.A. NO.
6409/13 APPLICATION FOR TAKING SUBSEQUENT EVENTS ON RECORD ON BEHALF
OF RESPONDENTS AND I.A. N\NO. 6410/13 APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS)
WITH

7. WP 12741/2007(S) M.P. STATE CO-POERATIVE OILSEED GROWERS AMALPUSHP SHROTI VIKRAM JOHRI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH A.G.,K.S.WADHWA,S.K.VERMA,KU.VANDANA SHRIVAST
V.AWASTHY(1 TO 3)
4,5
[FOR ADMISSION AND IR. ]
.
WITH

8. WP 6336/2008(S) M.P.STATE COOPERATIVE OILSEED GROSWER'S AMALPUSHP SHROTI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH A.G.
PURUSHAINDRA KAURAV[1 TO 4]
J.K.PILLAI [4,5]
[FOR ADM. AND IR]
.
WITH

9. WP 3665/2009(S) M.P.STATE CO-OPERATIVE OIL SEED GROWERS FEDERATION DHEERENDRA KUMAR KHARE
SHAMIM AHMED KHAN,S.DIXIT, D.SINGORE
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IR.]
.
WITH

10. WP 5417/2009(S) M.P.STATE CO-OPERATIVE OIL SEED GROWERS FEDERATION DHEERENDRA KUMAR KHARE
SHAMIM AHMED KHAN,S.DIXIT, D.SINGORE
S. GANGULY, AJAY TIWARI.A.P.SHROTI
Versus
CHIEF SECRETARY THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
NAMAN NAGRATH[GA 1-3],P.DHARMADHIKARI
JK PILLAI(R4 R5)
[FOR ORDERS]
.
WITH

11. WP 6978/2009(S) M.P.STATE CO-OPERATIVE OILSEED GROWERS FEDERATION AMALPUSHP SHROTI
VINAY KUMAR BURMAN
Versus
CHIEF SECRETARY THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
PURUSHAINDRA KAURAV[1 TO 3]
J.K.PILLAI [4,5]
[FOR ADM. AND IR.]
.
WITH

12. WP 1681/2010(S) M.P.STATE CO-OPERATIVE OIL SEED GROWERS FEDERATION DHEERENDRA KUMAR KHARE
Pg:3 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KESHAV KUMAR TRIVEDI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHAMIM AHMED KHAN,S.DIXIT, D.SINGORE
SWAPNIL GANGULY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
G.A.(R-1TO7)
J.K.PILLAI(R-8 AND9)
[ ON IA.NO. 5472/2010 FOR INTERIM RELIEF ]
.

13. WP 9296/2013(S) M.P. STATE UNIVERSITY SERVICE OFFICER UDYAN TIWARI
PRATICHI DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION ARISE WITH
REGARD TO PETITIONER NO. 4 AND 5 AS COMES WITHIN JURISDICTION OF
INDORE BENCH AND IR ]
[AFTER NOTICE MATTERS]
.

14. WP 20111/2011(O) RAM BHAROSE GOSWAMI R. K. SAMAIYA
SHAILENDRA SAMAIYA, NEETESH SINGH
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
VIKRAM SINGH [R1]
ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE/C.O.F.D.//
.

15. WP 2735/2013(S) AJIT NARAYAN AJIT NARAYAN (PETITIONAR)
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
KANAK GAHARWAR,RITU SHARMA(R-1)
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.
[FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE]
.

16. WP 6257/2001(S) D.P.AWASHTY KUMARESH PATHAK,AK.BAIN,RK.SAXENA,VK.YADAV
Versus
THE BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION M (FOR FINAL HEARING AT MOTION STAGE
.

17. WP 15022/2007(S) DR.SURENDRA KUMAR SAXENA MENON ASSOCIATES,G.S.NAMDEO,
AS.HANDA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
P.N.DUBEY[1,2]
[ FOR FINAL DISPOSAL IN MOTION HEARING]
.

18. WP 7012/2010(S) NAROTTAM DAS PANDEY R.C.TIWARI
SHAILESH TIWARI,
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
HARISH AGNIHOTRI [1-4)
J.K. VERMA, MANISH VERMA SACHIN K. VERMA [6]
Pg:4 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

19. WP 6408/2011(S) DR. VISHWANATH PRASAD AGNIHOTRI R.C.SHRIVASTAVA
SAJID AKHTAR, VRUSHAL BHIDE
Versus
M.P.STATE CO-OPERATIVE DAIRY FEDERATION LTD. ADVOCATE GENERAL
PIYUSH DHARMADHIKARI G.A.[5AND6]
PRANAY GUPTA(R-1 TO 3)
FINAL HEARING IN MOTIONSTAGE
.

20. WP 8358/2011(S) BHARTIYA PARIVAHAN KARMACHARI MAHASANGH BHOPAL ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA
SMT.NEELIMA GUPTA, KU.RASHMI SEN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL,PRASHANT SINGH
ASHOK SHRIVSTAVA,DHEERANDRA KUMAR KHARE(INT.)
KUMARESH PATHAK(R1TOR3)AG
P.C.CHANDAK, UTTAM MAHESHWARI, ARUN PATEL (4,5AND6)
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE] F.D...
.

21. WPS 12627/2004 SUNDER LAL RAJ AD.MISHRA,RR.SURVARIYA,NK.JAIN
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. A.G.[1TO4]
FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1dd1811730001.txt

DIVISION BENCH ( III )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA MENON
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL SHARMA
COURT ROOM NO.: 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[FIXED DATE CASES]
.

1. WP 3086/2010(O) DIWAKAR PRASAD TIWARI S.S. TIWARI
HARISH AGNIHOTRI,PRADEEP GUPTA
Versus
RAJEEV GANDHI PROUDYOGIK VISHWAVIDHYALAY PARITOSH GUPTA,SULEKHA SHARMA
[ FOR HEARING]
.

2. WP 3096/2012(CR) SMT. SUHADRA BAI YADAV UDAY KUMAR
SMT. LAXMI GOLHANI, LALJI KUSHWAHA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
ABHAY JAIN, MRS.DEVIKA SINGH[R5]
JAIDEEP SINGH [GA FOR R1 TO R4]
[ FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. ] FD
.

3. WP 5857/2012(O) VISHAL SHARMA V.K. JAIN,PRADEEP JAIN,
P.K. JAIN, SAPAN KOSHAL
Versus
RAJIVE GANDHI TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY ADVOCATE GENERAL(3 AND 4),MANISH VERMA(1)
BRIJESH CHOUBEY [R5]
PRADEEP SHARMA,JYOTI SHARMA,VAIBHAV TIWARI(R-2)
[ADM.AND IA 67/2013 GRANT OF LEAVE TO APPEAR IN THE 2ND SEM.EXAMINATION
AND IA 68/2013 URGENT HEARING APPLN.AND I.A.8197/13 FOR GRANT OF
LEAVE TO APPEAR IN THE 3RD SEMESTER EXAM. AND I.A.8195/13 FOR U/H.]

4. WP 10551/2012(O) THE DIRECTOR, MAHARISHI CENTRE FOR EDUCATIONAL EXC VISHAL BHATNAGAR
VIVEK BADERIYA
YOGESH BHATNAGAR,VISHAL MHAKI
Versus
THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION K.K.SINGH [1 AND 2],ADVOCATE GENERAL(4)
[FOR ADM. AND IR AND IA 15718/12 FOR DISMISSAL OF WP ANDI.A.NO.1769/13
FOR TAKING WRITTEN SUBMISSION.)

5. WP 7061/2013(O) DILEEP TIWARI ASHOK PANDEY
VIPUL JAIN
Versus
RANI DURGAWATI UNIVERSITY S.K.SHRIVASTAVA
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.
[MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS]
.

6. MCC 1119/2005 THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. KU.ANJANA SHRIVASTAVA,PRAKASH UPADHYAY
GOVIND PATEL,RAJEEV VERMA
SK. MUKHERJEE
Versus
M/S KOHLI TRADERS MADAN SINGH
[FOR ORDERS ON INDEFAULT OF LEGIBLE TYPED COPY OF ORDER OF M.A.
]
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA MENON
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL SHARMA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[AFTER NOTICE MATTERS]
.

7. WP 16293/2012(O) DAHYA BHAI CHUDASMA LAW COLLEGE PANNA, ATUL ANAND AWASTHY
RAMESHWAR P. SINGH, R.K. PANDEY
Versus
DR HARI SINGH GOUR VISHWA VIDYALAYA, SAGAR MENON ASSOCIATES
BRAMHADATT SINGH(R-3)
RAHUL CHOUBEY,C.A.THOMAS,SURABHI AHIRKAR(R-1)
FOR ADM. AND I.R.
.

8. WP 19739/2012(O) SMT. SHILPI BISWAS ASHISH RTIVEDI
P.AWASTHY,S.K. MISHRA ,A.TRIVEDI,SM. PATEL,S.YADAV
Versus
RANI DURGAWATI VISHWA VIDYALAY JABALPUR PRASHANT SINGH,PRADEEP SINGH,MANAS VERMA(R1-3
[FOR ADMISSION AND IR.]
.
[FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE]
.

9. WPS 1622/2004 THE STATE OF M.P. AG.,VIVEK AWASTHY
Versus
M.K.STHAPAK AND ORS. S.A.DHARMADHIKARI,G.PRASAD,A.SHRIVASTAVA[2]
R.C.TIWARI,SHAILESH TIWARI(1)
MANOJ SHARMA,S.GANGULY,H.CHOURASIYA[1]
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE]
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1dd185119990001.txt

DIVISION BENCH ( )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )

COURT ROOM NO.: 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS]
.

157. WP 9576/2013(I) ASHOK KINGAR RAJESH NEMA
ABHAY GUPTA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL

1. ADVANCED COPY OF THE APPEAL HAS NOT BEEN SERVED TO THE COUSNE
FOR RESP. NO. 1 AND DECLARATION REGARDING SERVICE OF THE SAME NOT
FILED . 2. NO. OF PAGES NOT MENTIONED IN THE LIST OF DOCUMENTS
PG.

158. WP 9604/2013(O) ARTI PATLE MANOJ MISHRA
VIVEK DIXIT
Versus
RANI DURGAWATI VISHWAVIDYALAYA P.K. KAURAV

1.CORRECT DECLARATION REGARDING THE ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO RESP.

159. WP 9611/2013(I) UNION OF INDIA JAMES ANTHONY
Versus
KAILASH CHANDRA VERMA
(1) TYPED COPIES OF HAND-WRITTEN DOCUMENTS P-3,PAGE NO. 37,39,56
TO 63,80,86,87,107 TO 114,116 TO 120,122 TO 127,132 TO 135,143,144
NOT FILED.
(2) UNDER-LINING OF HIGHLIGHTING THE PORTION IN DOCUMENT P-6, PAGE
NO. 43,101,
(3) LEGIBLE COPIES OF DOCUMENTS PAGE NO. 49,70,81,82,95,96,NOT
FILED.

160. CRA 1678/2005 PURUSHOTTAM SHARAD VERMA,ANIL TIWARI,DILIP SHRIVASTAVA
AK JAIN
MUKHOPADHYAY
A. MUKHOPADHYAY, VINOD KUMAR NAPIT, ASHMITA
MANISH,SIDDHARTH DATT,MANOJ PANDEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG
[FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT ON 02-05-13]
.

161. CRA 110/2006 DAUWA @ VISHWANATH JL.SONI,LK.MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ORDER ON NON/ APPEARANCE OF THE ACCUSED/APPELLANT ON 12/03/2013

162. CRA 343/2007 ANIL KUMAR DWIVEDI JAGAT SHER SINGH,AK.DUBEY,M.MISHRA
ANUVAD SHRIVASTAVA,AKHILESH MALVIYA
A.K.DWIVEDI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
ADITYA ADHIKARI, SATISH CHATURVEDI
G.S.AHLUWALIA
[FOR ORDER ON NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT ON 7/5/13 AND
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I.A. NO.10725/13 FOR EXEMPTION FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE ] WR

163. CRA 521/2010 GANESH NARENDRA NIKHARE
TARUN KUMAR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON NON APPEARANCE OF THE A/A ON 02/05/2013 AND I.A.NO.
10407/2013 APPL FOR CONDONATION OF NON APPEARANCE ON 02/5/2013
{A} W/R

164. CRA 558/2010 AMAR SINGH JAFAR KHAN,SATISH KASHYAP
UTTAM MAHESHWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ORDERS ON NON APPEARANCE OF THE ACCUSED/APPELLANT[AMAR SINGH]
ON 18/03/2013 W/R

165. CRA 63/2011 HANUMAN PRASAD TIWARI VIJAY NAYAK,M.DATT
ANAND NAYAK
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ORDER ON NON APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT NO. 3 ON 6/5/13
]W/R

166. CRA 1197/2011 RADHESHYAM HARI SHANKAR DUBEY
AMIT DUBEY, ABHINAV DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON NON-APPEARANCR OF THE ACCUSED/APPELLANT ON 30/03/2013.]
FD

167. CRA 1437/2011 SACHIN PETER LEO GREESHM JAIN
DILIP SINGH PARIHAR, SATYAPAL SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/ APPELLANT ON 6.5.13]
W/R

168. CRA 1686/2011 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL,S. K. KASHYAP
Versus
RAMASHRAY KUSHWAHA AKHIL SINGH
RAJESH SEN, MANOJ SONI [1]
[FOR ORDER ON NON APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED/RESPONDANT NO,1(RAMASHRAY)
ON 6/5/2013 WR

169. CRA 1198/2013 ABRAR SHAH @ ABRAR KALA ANURAG SAHU
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF- 1. INDEX NOT FILED;
2.A.K.N. STAMPS ON VAKALATNAMA.

170. CRA 1204/2013 OMPRAKASH CHOUDHARY G.S. AHLUWALIA
B.K.UPADHYAY
Pg:3 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
IN DEFAULT OF- MENTIONING INCORRECT CONVICTION SECTION IN CAUSE
TITLE OF THE APPEAL.

171. CRA 1232/2013 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
Versus
VASUDEV KORI
NOT FILING APPLN. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY ALONGWITH AFFIDAVIT.

172. MCRC 6336/2013 CHANDA @ CHANDRABHAN S.D. KHAN
N.K.MISHRA
Versus
DEVENDRA PATEL
[1]C.C.OF ORDER IMPUGNED[LIMITATION SHOULD BE CAUCULATED AFTER
FILING C.C.OF ORDER IMPUGNED],[2]INCORRECT PROVISION OF LAW IN
MEMO OF APPEAL,[3]SIGNATURE OF THE COUNSEL IN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE
TO APPEAL.

173. WA 536/2013 NISHCHAL JHARIA ASHISH TRIVEDI
ASEEM TRIVEDI, RITESH SHARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
(1) PAGING IN THE INDEX (2) DEFICIT C.F.RS.25/- ON THE DELAY APPLICATION
AND RS. 10/- ON THE C.C.OF IMPUGNED ORDER (3) SETS OF WP NOT ATTESTED
AS A TRUE COPY AND ALSO NOT MENTION IN THE INDEX AND PAGING ACCORDINGLY
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1dd1890850001.txt

DIVISION BENCH ( I )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE
COURT ROOM NO.: 20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[FIXED DATE CASES]
.

1. WP 20679/2012(O) M/S SONY ENTERPRISES J.K.VERMA
MANISH VERMA ,SACHIN K.VERMA ,VINOD SISODIA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA GOVIND PATEL
[IN DEFAULT OF (4) COPY OF POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT FILED. AND I.A.NO.4671/2013
FOR AMENDMENT AND IA. NO.7869/2013 FOR LISTING THE CASE DURING SUMMER
VACATION]

2. WP 10023/2013(O) PEOPLES COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH C AMALPUSHP SHROTI
NIVEDITA SHORTI,MADHUR SHUKLA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.

3. WP 10025/2013(O) PEOPLES COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH C AMALPUSHP SHROTI
NIVEDITA SHORTI,MADHUR SHUKLA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.

4. WP 10026/2013(O) PEOPLES COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH C AMALPUSHP SHROTI
NIVEDITA SHORTI,MADHUR SHUKLA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND IR]
.

5. WP 10027/2013(O) PEOPLES COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH C AMALPUSHP SHROTI
NIVEDITA SHORTI,MADHUR SHUKLA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND IR]
.

6. WP 10028/2013(O) PEOPLES COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH C AMALPUSHP SHROTI
NIVEDITA SHORTI,MADHUR SHUKLA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.

7. WP 10029/2013(O) PEOPLES COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH C AMALPUSHP SHROTI
NIVEDITA SHORTI,MADHUR SHUKLA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.

8. WP 10031/2013(O) PEOPLES COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH C AMALPUSHP SHROTI
NIVEDITA SHORTI,MADHUR SHUKLA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FOR ADMISSION AND IR]
.

9. WP 10035/2013(O) PEOPLES COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH C AMALPUSHP SHROTI
NIVEDITA SHORTI,MADHUR SHUKLA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.

10. WP 10037/2013(O) PEOPLES COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESARCH CEN AMALPUSHP SHROTI
NIVEDITA SHORTI,MADHUR SHUKLA
Versus
SECRETARY UNION OF INDIA
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.
[AFTER NOTICE MATTERS]
.

11. WP 17076/2012(PIL) UMESH CHANDRA GUPTA V.P. SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, LOCAL SELF DEPARTMENT ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR FINAL HEARING AT MOTION
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1wd1890850001.txt

1. FA 661/2000 SMT.MANJUSHA JADHAV AMIT VERMA
Versus
PRADEEP JADHAV KS.WADHWA
ANOOP NAIR,P.SHANKARAN,S.PUNJ(R-1)
.
IMPORTANT NOTES : - 1. THE LAWYERS ARE REQUESTED TO KEEP READY 3 SETS OF XEROX COPIES OF RELEVANT JUDGMENTS (TWO SETS FOR THE
COURT AND ONE FOR BEING PROVIDED TO THE COUNSEL OF THE OPPOSITE PARTY) RELIED UPON BY THEM.
2. THE LAWYERS ARE ALSO REQUESTED TO PROVIDE IN ADVANCE TO THE COURT READER THE LIST OF ACTS/RULES TO BE
RELIED UPON BY THEM.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
2d1818000
01.txt

34. WP 10304/2013(O) WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD GREESHM JAIN
SATYAPAL SINGH, DILIP PARIHAR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.] C.S.
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
2d1837000
01.txt

9. WP 12841/2009(O) MANOJ SINGH THAKUR B.K. SHRIVASTAVA,S.K.RAGHUVANSHI,A.K.DUBEY
Versus
CHAIRMAN RAKESH JAIN,SMT.JYOTI JAIN,ROHIT JAIN [ALL]
JITENDRA SINGH
[FOR ADM.,I.R.] ..
.
WITH

10. WP 12262/2009(O) BALRAM UPADHYAY B.K.SHRIVASTAVA,S.K.RAGHUVANSHI
PRASHANT CHOURASIYA
Versus
CHAIRMAN M.P.HOUSING BOARD RK.SAMAIYA,SAHILENDRA SAMAIYA,RAJROOP PATEL(R-3)
R-1 TO 4
[FOR ADM.,I.R. AND IA 4068/11 FOR DISPOSAL OF THE CASE AT MOTION
STAGE] 4/W
WITH

11. WP 12286/2009(O) DR. PRAHLAD SAINI B.K. SHRIVASTAVA,S.K.RAGHUVANSHI
AJIT KUMAR DUBEY
Versus
CHAIRMAN RAKESH JAIN,SMT.JYOTI JAIN,ROHIT JAIN [ALL]
JITENDRA SINGH
[FOR ADM. AND IR]
.

12. WP 10061/2012(O) PRAMOD SONKAR R.K. CHOUBEY
M.K. CHOUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
K KHARE(R4)
ANIL KUMAR JAIN, P JAIN, Y GAUTAM, E RAJPOOT
[FOR ORDERS ON I.A.5580/2013 FOR FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE]
..
REGISTRAR(J-II)
2d1851100
001.txt

174. CRA 2237/2010 ZEESHAN KHAN I MTIAZ HUSAIN
MOHD.QASIM, ISHETEYAQ HUSSAIN, S.PANDEY
Versus
OWAIS ADVOCATE GENERAL
K.N.FADHUDDIN, A.R.KHAN,V.A.ANASARI [1]
[FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENT NO. 1 OWAIS ON 30/04/13]W/R LINK
CRA.2178/10 FD

175. MCRC 6268/2013 SHAKEEL AHMAD PARAG S. CHATURVEDI
PARIMAL CHATURVEDI,ABAHY S,KUSHWAHA,BHARAT DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-INCORRECT PAGING IN INDEX]
.

176. MCRC 6531/2013 JAGESHWAR GHANSHYAM PANDEY
SUNIL MISHRA,JS.PATEL,LP.YADAV
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-1.DATE OF APPLICATION NOT MENTIONED IN PARTICULARS
OF EARLIER BAIL. 2.INCOMPLETE LIST OF DOCUMENT]

177. MCRC 6642/2013 ANISH GUPTA SIDDHARTH DATT
DATT N.ASSOCIATES
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

1.AVERMENT REGARDING B.A. NO. IN PARA NO.1 OF PETITION. 2.ANNEXURE
A/3 NOT FILED. 3.INCOMPLETE LIST OF DOCUMENT.

178. MCRC 6650/2013 SUBHASH CHANDRA SONI AWADHESH GUPTA
AK.PANDEY,DEEAPK TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-1.FACTS AND GROUND NOT MENTIONED IN PETITION. 2.INCOMPLTE
LIST OF DOCUMENT]

179. MCRC 6656/2013 BHURA AHIRWAR ARVIND SONI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-1.NAME OF JUDGE NOT MENTIONED. 2.INCORRECT CASE NO.(YEAR)
AND INSTITUTION DATE NOT MENTIONED IN PARTICUALRS OF EARLIER BAIL]

180. MCRC 7329/2013 PURUSHOTTAM BASOR ANOOP SAXENA
ALPANA SAXENA,CHHOTI KUSHRAM
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-ENROLLMENT AND SIGNATURE OF ALL COUNSELS ON VAKALATNAMA]

181. MCRC 7357/2013 RAHUL CHOUDHARI ASHOK KOSHTA
VINOD KOSHTA
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-[1] BAIL APPLICATION MENTIONED IN PARTICULARS OF
IMPUGNED ORDER NOT TALLY WITH IMPUGNED ORDER]

182. MCRC 7360/2013 LAMBARDAR SINGH URF KRISHNADEV SINGH SANJAY KUMAR BAKSHI
NEELESH JAIN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-PAGING OF PETITION NOT DONE]
.

183. MCRC 7365/2013 GHANSHYAM BARASKAR SUSHIL TIWARI
RAVENDRA TIWARI,SMT.SHANTA TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-PAGING OF PETTITION NOT DONE]
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
2d1872000
01.txt

13. CRA 2107/2012 GOLU @ OMPRAKASH P.P. BUDHOLIYA
SANJAY SONI, AJAY SEN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
DEEPAK TIWARI[COMPLAINANT]
[FOR ORDERS ON I.A. NO. 5062/13 FOR APPLICATION U/S 320(1) READ
WITH SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR COMPROMISE
IN THE CASE]
REGISTRAR(J-II)
2d1874000
01.txt

5. FA 21/2009 M/S STANDARAD TENT HOUSE COLECTRATE RAOD B.M.DWIVEDI
Versus
RANI DURAGAVATI VISHWAVIDYALAYA SUYASH TRIPATHI [1]
[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL AT MOTION STAGE
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
2d1882000
01.txt

22. WP 10470/2013(CR) RAGHUVEER KUMAR SONI PRAHLAD CHOUDHARY
RAVI RAISAS
VINOD DANGE, ARPAN SHRIVASTAVA, PRADYUMN PARE,
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
2dd1811730001.txt

10. CONCR 10/2013 IN REFERENCE IN-REF
Versus
SHRI RAJNARAYAN PANDEY ASHISH TRIVEDI, P AWASTHY, A TRIVEDI, R SHARMA
A SHUKLA, A CHOUBEY(R1)
[FOR PRESENCE OF RAJNARAYAN CONS. NO. 277]
.
[AFTER NOTICE MATTERS]
.

11. WP 11184/2012(O) MAA SHARDA INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CENTRE SOM MISHRA,ANIL KHARE
SHUBHA AGRAWAL, YASH SONI
NAMRATA KESHARWANI, HARJAS SINGH CHHABRA
SMT. MANISHA KHARE, SATYENDRA PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL,VIKRAM SINGH
PIYUSH DHARMADHIKARI [GA FOR R1 TO R3]
G.A.(R-1 TO 7)
[FOR ADMISSION
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
2dd185119990001.txt

DIVISION BENCH ( )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE REGISTRAR ( J-I )

COURT ROOM NO.: 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS]
.

184. WP 10293/2013(O) KAMLA SHANKAR PATEL R.L. GUPTA
SIDDHARTH GUPTA, S.K.GARG, MUNISH SINGH
Versus
AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH UNIVERSITY
COPY TO STANDING COUNSEL FOR RES.NO.1 WITH DECLARATION. C.S.
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
2wd1816760001.txt

DIVISION BENCH ( IV )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M.A. SIDDIQUI
COURT ROOM NO.: 7
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL HEARING
.
[PART HEARD CASES]
.

1. CRA 2093/1997 RAVISHANKAR TIWARI V.P.SINGH,SUDHISH SHRIVASTAVA,NP.RATHORE,
JAGAT SHER SINGH,AK.DUBEY,RAJKAMAL,H.DWIVEDI
M.MISHRA
SANTOSH KUMAR PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. TH: CBI, JABALPUR JAYANT NIKHRA,A.GUPTA,R.L.GUPTA
.
[FINAL HEARING]
.

2. CRA 562/2013 TYOPHIL TIGGA MANINDER S BHATTI
Y.M.TIWARI, PRAVEEN SEN, R.C.SHARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
RITESH SHARMA, RAKESH SHUKLA [R1]
PANKAJ DUBEY, VIREDNRA SINGH, SANJAY SONI,
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
3d1879000
01.txt

33. MCRC 6879/2013 PRAKASH SHUKLA SHYAM VISHWAKARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.NO. 12309/2013 APPL FOR GRANT OF AD INTERIM BAIL]
FD
[FRESH MATTERS]
.

34. MCRC 6185/2013 RAM KUMAR NARESH SHARMA
DEVESH KHATRI,INDU PANDEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.11451/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM BAIL]
.

35. MCRC 6607/2013 SUBHASH PATEL MRIGENDRA SINGH
ANURAG HAZARI, KAUSTUBH SINGH, VIKAS MAHAWAR
AVINASH PATEL, AMIT KHATRI, RANVEER SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.11736/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

36. MCRC 7216/2013 GOVIND SIDDHARTH DATT
DATT N.ASSOCIATES
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.12813/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

37. MCRC 7342/2013 SHREE PRAKASH SINGH SIDDHARTH DATT
DATT N.ASSOCIATES
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.12954/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM BAIL]
.

38. MCRC 7377/2013 BUDDHA SEN PATEL SIDDHARTH DATT
DATT N.ASSOCIATES
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13016/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

39. MCRC 7392/2013 BHAGWANDAS DHEEMAR G.S. THAKUR
SUDEEP PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13027/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

40. MCRC 7400/2013 DHANIRAM ALIAS RAKSHPAL P.S. TIWARI
MANISH TIWARI,ASHISH TIWARI,SMT.ARTI TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13042/2013 FOR FINAL HEARING AT MOTION STAGE AND
IA.13062/2013 FOR DOCUMENT TAKING ON RECORD]

41. MCRC 7402/2013 MANOJ PANDEY SHAKTI PRAKASH PANDEY
UK.TRIPATHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13043/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

42. MCRC 7404/2013 AJJU CHOUHAN PARITOSH TRIVEDI
MANOJ SONI,ANURAG PRAJAPATI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13046/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

43. MCRC 7408/2013 SMT. KAMLA BAI SUSHIL TIWARI
RAVENDRA TIWARI,SMT.SHANTA TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13051/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

44. MCRC 7418/2013 SHAHID KHAN A. USMANI
ARJUN PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13058/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-NTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

45. MCRC 7419/2013 AJAB SINGH CHOUDHARY SHAKTI SONI
J.K.PILLAI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13059/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

46. MCRC 7425/2013 ANKIT TIWARI ALOK VAGRECHA
SD.MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13064/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

47. MCRC 7427/2013 ANKIT TIWARI ALOK VAGRECHA
SD.MISHRA
Versus
Pg:3 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13065/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

48. MCRC 7429/2013 ANKIT TIWARI ALOK VAGRECHA
SD.MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13068/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

49. MCRC 7430/2013 CHANCHAL SINGH CHAUHAN RAMAN PATEL
VASEEM KHAN
SANGEETA SHARMA,ARUN PAROHA,SN.KORI,MAHESH SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13069/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]

50. MCRC 7433/2013 UMASHANKAR SINGH P.S. TIWARI
MANISH TIWARI,ASHISH TIWARI,SMT.ARTI TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.13070/2013 FOR GRANT OF AD-INTERIM ANTICIPATORY
BAIL]
[INTERIM MATTERS]
.

51. MCRC 6197/2013 BALDAU DILIP SHRIVASTAVA
VISHNU UPADHYAY,CL.SETHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[ON IA (12841/2013) FOR URGENT HEARING ]
.

52. MCRC 6317/2013 YOGESH KUSHWAHA GHANSHYAM PANDEY
PR.PANDEY,SUNIL MISHRA,JS.PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON I.A. NO.13247/2013 URGENT HEARING APPLN. ]
.

53. MCRC 6564/2013 RAHUL MEHSRAM V.D.S. CHAUHAN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR I.A. NO. 13003/13 FOR URGENT HEARING ]
.

54. MCRC 6994/2013 VIVEK SHARMA @ RAGGU SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH
AKHIL SINGH, SATENDRA SINGH TIWARI, MANISH DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[ON IA (13067/2013) FOR URGENT HEARING ]
.

55. MCRC 6997/2013 BANTI @ SHYAM SUNDER CHOUHAN O.P. AGNIHOTRI
Pg:4 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SMT. RANJNA AGNIHOTRI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA,R.K.TIWARI,RAHUL MISHRA(OBJ.)
[ON IA (13032/2013) FOR URGENT HEARING ]
.

56. MCRC 7025/2013 KHALEEL AHMAD DINESH UPADHYAY
MANISH TRIVEDI, ASHISH AGRAWAL, SANTOSH MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[ON IA (13041/2013) FOR URGENT HEARING ]
.

57. MCRC 7243/2013 SHRAVAN KUMAR SHUKLA PRAKASH UPADHYAY
RAHUL TRIPATHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[ON IA (13054/2013) FOR URGENT HEARING ]
.
[MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS]
.

58. MCRC 1726/2010 MOHD AFZAL MANOJ JAIN
KL.GUPTA,REKHA YADAV
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR 3834/2010 FOR EXEMPTION FROM COMPLAINT CASE NO.IN BAIL APPL]

59. MCRC 5582/2013 SADHAN DAS P.S. TIWARI
MANISH TIWARI,ASHISH TIWARI,SMT.ARTI TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-1.DATE OF ARREST NOT MENTIONED. 2.INCOMPLETE LIST
OF DOCUMENT AND INDEX. 3.CERTIFIED COPY OR PHOTOCOPY OF REJECTION
ORDER OF ALL EARLIER APPLICATIONS AND LOWER COURT.4. ANNEXURE A/3
(DTD.07/12/12) NOT FILED AS DETAILED IN INDEX AND LIST OF DOCUMENT]

60. MCRC 5737/2013 KULDEEP MISHRA SAMPOORN TIWARI
HS.RAJPOOT,RS.CHOUDHARY,P.PRAJAPATI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-(1) CERTIFIED COPY OR PHOTOCOPY OF REJECTION ORDER
OF LOWER COURT. 2.INCORRECT CRIME NO.(NOT TELLY WITH PREVIOUS BAIL)]

61. MCRC 5847/2013 INDRABHAN @ SHAHIL R.L. ARIHA
ASHOK CHOUDHARY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-[1] INCORRECT INDEX, LIST OF DOCUMENTS (PAGE NOS.).
[2] PETITION NOT ARRANGED PROPERLY (DOCUMENTS).[3] DEFECTIVE VAKALATNAMA.
[4] DATE OF ARREST MENTIONED IN PARTICULARS OF CRIME NOT TALLY
WITH IMPUGNED ORDER. [5] ANNEXURE WRONGLY MARKED ON PARA 5.2 IN
PETITION]
Pg:5 DAILY CAUSELIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

62. MCRC 6072/2013 SUNIL BARMAN NARESH SHARMA
DEVESH KHATRI,INDU PANDEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-1.MENTIONING INCORRECT NAME OF JUDGE. 2.INCOMPLETE
LIST OF DOCUMENT]

63. MCRC 6080/2013 TORAN SINGH SANKALP KOCHAR
AKSHAT TIWARI,SK.DIXIT,V.MISHRA,V.TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-NOT MENTIONING CRIME NO.]
.

64. MCRC 6203/2013 NONELAL @ NONE SINGH RAJPOOT PRADEEP NAVERIYA
SANJAY SONI,AJAY SEN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR DEFAULT:-1.INCORRECT AGE OF APPLICANT AND DATE OF ARREST(NOT
TELLY WITH PREVIOUS BAIL). 2.MENTIONING INCORRECT CASE NO. IN PARTICULARS
OF EARLIER BAIL. 3.ANNEXURE P/1 NOT FILED]

65. MCRC 7230/2013 SHIV PRATAP NISHAD SARDAR AVTAR SINGH
KUNDAN LAL PRAJAPATI, SUBHADRA DEVI
SHRIKANT BENDEY, SHIV SHANKAR SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG
[FOR DEFAULT:-(3) SIGNATURE OF COUNSEL NOT ON INDEX AND PETITION.
(4) COMPLETE ADDRESS OF APPLICANT ON POWER]
[AFTER NOTICE MATTERS]
.

66. MCRC 4629/2013 MANISH KUMAR PANDEY ASHOK K. TIWARI
VAIBHAV AGNIHOTRI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR I.A.13024/2013 FOR URGENT HEARING]
.

67. MCRC 7307/2013 MANOJ P.S. TIWARI
G.P.TIWARI
MANISH TIWARI, ASHISH TIWARI, SMT. ARTI TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR IA NO.13061/2013 APPL. FOR FINAL HEARING AT MOTION STAGE]
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
4d1872000
01.txt

7. MCRC 15452/2012 DEVANAND MISHRA MUKESH MISHRA
RAMA BHATTACHARYA (4)
MR.S. VINEETA KEWAT (1,2,3)
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[ FOR IA NO. 26859/2012 FOR GRANTING PERMISSION TO COMPROMISE
AND IA NO. 26861/2012FOR COMPOUNDING THE OFFENCE ] F.D. (WITH RECORD)

8. CRR 1959/2008 PANKAJ SINGH CHAUHAN MANOJ KUMAR PANDE,MK.TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR FURTHER ORDER.
.

9. CRR 945/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SANJAY SHARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADM. AND IA.NO. 11965/2013 FOR GRANT OF STAY] .
.
[FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE]
.

10. CRR 1881/2010 ASRAF KHAN N.K.MISHRA
Versus
SMT. NAJMA KHAN ASEEM DIXIT, SD MISHRA(R1)
[FOR FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE ]
.

11. CRR 1639/2011 SANTOSH KUMAR PANDEY PUSHPRAJ PANDEY
A.R.LAKHERA, C.P.SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE]
.

12. CRR 685/2012 BHOLE SHANKAR P.S.TIWARI
SANJAY SHARMA
MANISH TIWARI, ASHISH TIWARI, SMT.ARTI TIWARI
Versus
SMT. GHANISHTA PATLE A.USMANI
[FOR FINAL HEARING IN MOTION STAGE ]W/R
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
6wd1816760001.txt

3. WP 20883/2012(O) SAMEER A.USMANI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
YOGESH DHANDE(R1-R4)(
.

4. WP 2597/2013(CR) TANZEEL KHAN A.K.PARE
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
KUMARESH PATHAK [GA FOR R1 TO R4]
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
9d1818000
01.prn
M.P. HIGH COURT
SINGLE BENCH ( I )
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE U.C. MAHESHWARI
COURT ROOM NO.: 6
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[NOT REACHED CASES]

1. MCRC 4189/2013 NEELESH CHOUDAHA SIDDHARTH DATT
NISHANT DATT, PUSHPENDRA DUBEY, AJAY MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTAINABILITY] [SECOND BAIL]
.

2. WP 9084/2013(O) HIMANSHU DWIVEDI ANIRUDDH MISHRA
C.P. DWIVEDI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION ]
.

3. WP 9544/2013(I) REGISTRAR PUBLIC TRUST VIVEK AGRAWAL
Versus
SHIVNARAYAN
FOR ADMISSION AND I.A. NO. 7326/20
13.FOR STAY.]
.

4. WP 9564/2013(O) YOGESH KUMAR PATEL ATUL NEMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ADMISSION.]
.

5. WP 14270/2012(O) SUDAMA AJAY KUMAR JAIN
RAJEEV BARKUR, MANOJ KUSHWAHA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL,S.DUBEY
[ FOR ADMISSION AND INTERIM RELIEF ] //C.O.W,C.//
.

6. CRA 1722/2009 ANIL SINGH@ABBU SETH MANISH DATT
SIDDARTH DATT, G.P.PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDERS ON IA NO. 15128/12 AT (A) FOR GRANT OF BAIL TO ACC./APP.
NO. 2 (RAVINDRA) W/R (LINKED WITH CRA 1945/09, 1806/09,2044/09
1895/09 AND 186/10)

7. WP 1782/2013(O) SHRI DUKHI LAL GYANENDRAA K. PATHAK
SHILPA PATHAK
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR DEFAULT OF (1) UNDER-LINING OF HIGHLIGHTING THE PORTION IN
PAGE NO.14,16. (2) ONE SIDE OF VAKALATNAMA NOT USED AS PER CHAPTER
VIII R 5 (1) OF HIGH COURT OF M.P. RULES 2008/ SIGNATURE OF COUNSEL/PETITIONER
ON BACK SIDE OF VAKALATNAMA

8. WP 7435/2011(I) RAMAKANT RATNER R.L. ARIHA
ASHOK CHOUDHARY
Versus
GOPAL PRASAD SHARMA ADVOCATE GENERAL
MANOJ KUMAR CHATURVEDI (1)
( FOR ADMISSION AND IA.NO. 5956/20
11.FOR STAY ]
.
Contd... 2/-
- 2-
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE U.C. MAHESHWARI

9. WP 418/2013(O) RAMESH SINGH THAKUR RAMAN PATEL
SOMNATH KORI, MAHESH SINGH
SANGEETA SHARMA, SIDDHARTH RAI, ARUN PAROHA,
Versus
CANARA BANK PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI,ALOK MISHRA(R-1)
FOR ADMISSION
.

10. WP 10007/2013(I) SANTOSH THAKUR @ D. CHANDRA MALIJK PETITIONER HIMSELF
Versus
MANAGER AND AUTHORISED OFFICER,
FOR ADMISSION AND I.A.NO. 7868/201
3.FOR INTERIM RELIEF ] V.A.
.

11. WP 10193/2013(O) PRATAP SINGH U.K. TRIPATHI
S.P. PANDEY
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ASSITANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. ] V.A.
.

12. WP 10205/2013(O) BACHCHAN @ KAMLESHWAR PRASAD SANKALP KOCHAR
VIKAS TIWARI, Y.S. BAGHEL
VENEET MISHRA, S.K.DIXIT, SHIVENDRA PANDEY,
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.] WITH V.A.
.

13. WP 10209/2013(O) VAYU BUILDCON PVT. LTD. SHAKEEL AHMED
SHAILENDRA DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. ] V.A.
.

14. WP 10213/2013(I) SANJAY KUMAR GUJARE R. S. VERMA
SANDEEP SHUKLA
Versus
SMT. SHAILI GUJARE AJAY MISHRA(CAVEAT)
FOR ADMISSION AND I.A.NO. 8139/201
3.FOR GRANT OF STAY ] V.A.
.

15. WP 10221/2013(I) SMT. DHAPU BAI ATUL ANAND AWASTHY
R.K. PANDEY, BHASKAR PANDEY, SWEETA GUPTA
Versus
DHASRATH
FOR ADMISSION AND I.A.NO. 8115/201
3.FOR GRANT OF AD INTERIM WRIT
] V.A.

16. WP 10222/2013(O) GYANCHAND JAIN SHARAD S. VERMA
L.K. PANDEY, RAKESH DWIVEDI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. ] V.A.
.

17. WP 10223/2013(O) JABBAR KHAN SHARAD S. VERMA
L.K. PANDEY,RAKESH DWIVEDI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND IR]VA
.
Contd... 3/-
- 3-
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE U.C. MAHESHWARI

18. WP 10224/2013(I) LAKHANLAL RAJESH CHAND
BASANT PATEL
S.K. DUBEY, MONESH SAHU, BALDEV PATEL,
Versus
DURAGAPRASAD
FOR ADMISSION AND I.A.NO. 8120/201
3.FOR STAY ] V.A.
.

19. WP 10238/2013(O) MANSHARAM M. AADIL USMANI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND IR]VA
.

20. WP 10265/2013(I) SMT. ANITA PATEL ARUN KUMAR CHOUBEY
KU.SUDIPTA CHOUBEY
Versus
CHANDRABHAN PATEL
[FOR ADMISSION AND IA.NO.8150/13 FOR INTERIM ORDER]VA

21. WP 2671/2012(I) SMT. MAMTA DEVI AMILESH CHATURVEDI
Versus
BHAGWAT PRASAD ADVOCATE GENERAL
[ FOR I.A.NO.8159/2013 FOR URGENT HEARING DURING SUMMER VACATION].//C.O.AFTER

2.WEEKS//

22. WP 3766/2012(O) SMT. HIRESHWARI ASEEM TRIVEDI
B.R.VIJAYWAR, SMT. S.NAIDU
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
PIYUSH DHARMADHIKARI [GA FOR R1 TO R5]
(FOR ORDERS ON ADMISSION AND I.R. AND I.A. NO. 5184/13 APPLICATION
FOR TAKING REJOINDER ON RECORD AND I.A. NO. 8145/13 APPLICATION
FOR URGENT HEARING DURING SUMMER VACATION)

23. WP 17321/2012(O) R.K. JAIN S.P. SHARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ORDER ON I.A. NO.7995/2013 FOR URGENT HEARING DURING SUMMER
VACATION-

24. WP 597/2013(O) NIRPAT DURGESH THAPA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ADMISSION AND IA 8168/13 FOR SUMMER VACATION.
.

25. WP 1455/2013(O) AADIM JATI SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT GANDHI GRA VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
RAHUL MISHRA, R.K. TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
V.D.S.CHAUHAN(R-5)
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.AND I.A.NO.3854/2013 FOR VACATING STAY]
.
Contd... 4/-
- 4-
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE U.C. MAHESHWARI

26. WP 4035/2013(I) RAMVICHAR VISHWAKARMA A.P. SHAH
SANDEEP KHARE, R.K.SAHU
Versus
RANJIT VISHWAKARMA ADVOCATE GENERAL
PUSHPRAJ SINGH GAHARWAR,U.S.JAIWAL(R5,R9,R10)
P.S. GAHARWAR,U.S.JAISWAL(R1,R3,R11)
P.S. GAHARWAR,U.S.JAIWAL(R4,R6,R7)
P.S. GAHARWAR,U.S.JAIWAL(R2,R15,R16)
[FOR ORDER ON. IA. NO. 8107/2013 FOR HEARING SUMMER VACATION
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
9d1882000
01.prn

SINGLE BENCH ( VIII )
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KESHAV KUMAR TRIVEDI
COURT ROOM NO.: 9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION HEARING
.
[NOT REACHED CASES]
.

1. WP 10074/2013(S) SANTOSH KUMAR PANKAJ DUBEY
VIRENDRA SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.

2. WP 10132/2013(CR) ABHISHEK @ CHINTU CHOUKSEY H.K. DWIVEDI
R. GUPTA, . S. SHARMA
Versus
SECRETARY THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG
FOR ORDERS ON THE QUESTION OF MAINTAINABILITY ]
.

3. WP 10273/2013(S) HEERA NAYAK SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH
SATENDRA SINGH TIWARI, AKHIL SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.]
.

4. WP 9997/2013(S) RAM PRAKASH RAGHUVANSHI SANJAY K. AGRAWAL
AMIT SEN,P.BHATNAGAR,R.S.KUSHWAHA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
AMITABHA GUPTA(CAVEAT)
[FOR ADMISSION AND IR ]
.

5. WP 10188/2013(S) PRABHAKAR TIKARIA SANJAY K. AGRAWAL
A. SETH, P. BHATNAGAR, R.S. KUSHWAHA,
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. ] V.A.
.

6. WP 10198/2013(S) RAJESH KUMAR CHATURVEDI SATYENDRA PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR ADMISSION AND IR]VA
.

7. WP 20654/2011(S) RAJENDRA SINGH BAIS ARVIND CHOUKSEY
ANWAR AHMED, M.CHOUBEY
K.K.AGNIHOTRI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
SANJAY DWIVEDI [ GA FOR R1 TO R3]
[ FOR ORDER ON IA. 7991/2013 HEARING SUMMAR VACATION
.

8. WP 2167/2013(S) RUPLAL KATRE D.S. THAKUR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
[FOR I.A. NO. 8137/2013 FOR U/H DURING SUMMER VACATION. ]
.
Contd... 2/-
- 2-
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KESHAV KUMAR TRIVEDI

9. WP 7323/2013(S) GOPINATH TIWARI K.C.GHILDAYAL
M.K.RAJAK, P.DWIVEDI,H.C.SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
KUSH SINGH,ALOK NAYAK(INT.)
FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. AND 8026/20
13.FOR URGENT HEARING DURING SUMMER
VACATION, IA NO. 8027/2013 FOR INTERVENTION AND IA NO. 8028/2013
FOR VACATING INTERIM ORDER ]
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1w1867000
01.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( CRIMINAL )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
COURT ROOM NO.: 4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL HEARING
.
[FINAL HEARING] [IN JAIL]
.

1. CRA 342/2006 RAMDAS RAIKWAR [DHEEMAR] VK.DEOLIA,SD.MISHRA,CS.JHARIYA,SHARAD VERMA
S.VERMA,A.PANDEY,ANIL TIWARI,H.CHOURASIA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.

2. CRA 363/2006 RAMKRIPAL PATEL SANJAY PATEL,VISHWAS AWASTHI,G.PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.

3. CRA 425/2006 MANJA @ MUNNALAL SHARAD SHRIVASTAVA,RAJ KAMAL CHATURVEDI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

4. CRA 447/2006 DIBBU @ SIDHIKANT JAIL APPEAL,SMT.DURGESH GUPTA,AMOD GUPTA
AJAY TAMRAKAR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.

5. CRA 448/2006 MOTILAL JAIL APPEAL,ALKA PANDYA,KU.JYOTI AGNIHOTRI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

6. CRA 457/2006 RAJJU @ PRABHUDAYAL RAJPUT LN.SAKLE,A.TIWARI,SK.THAKUR,A.MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

7. CRA 1821/2006 SANT KUMAR ANKINT PANDEY,MISS.ABHA PANDEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.

8. CRA 2158/2007 ACHHU @ ASHISH @ MANOJ SHIVANI SHARAD VERMA, S.VERMA
H.S.VERMA,P.N.VERMA,AJAY PAL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.
WITH

9. CRA 2322/2008 BABLA @ SURESH JITENDRA TIWARI,MEENA TIWARI
SHARAD S. VERMA,DILIP SHRIVASTAVA,A.PANDEY,N.KUMAR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
WITH

10. CRA 2369/2008 ACHHU @ ASHISH SHARAD S.VERMA,AMIT PANDEY,N.KARAN,V.DUBEY
HS VERMA, PN VERMA, AJAY PAL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

11. CRA 2232/2007 TARIK PRAMOD THAKRE,VIKASH JYOTASHI
PRANAY VERMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
WITH

12. CRA 2256/2007 RAMU PATEL B.J.,SMT.MADHUBALA CHOURASIYA
PRIYANK CHOUBEY, VIKALP SONI
P.CHOUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

13. CRA 212/2008 VIRENDRA MADAN SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

14. CRA 249/2008 JALAL G.R.DESHMUKH,V.PASI,V.KHARE
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.

15. CRA 658/2008 RAMBABU VIJAY PANDEY,AJAY SHUKLA,RAJNISH CHOUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

16. CRA 668/2008 MAHADEO PRANAY VERMA,S.PATEL
S.PATEL,P.VERMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.

17. CRA 725/2008 DHANI RAM KOL VK.LAKHERA,NEENA KHERA,
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

18. CRA 872/2008 MOHD.TAHIR AD.MISHRA,RAJEEV PANDEY,PANKAJ TIWARI,NK.JAIN
ASHISH TIWARI,PRAVESH MISHRA,MANISH TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.
WITH

19. CRA 713/2008 ALOK MISHRA HARI SHANKAR DUBEY,AMIT DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
WITH

20. CRA 866/2008 DABBU @ ANURAG HARI SHANKER DUBEY,AMIT,ABHINAV DUBEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1w1872000
01.txt

1. CRA 1849/1997 BABULAL @ BABBU PRAMOD VERMA,MOHD.SHAFI,MALA VERMA,
SK.KANOJIA /
DR.US.BENDE,
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. A.G.
.

2. CRA 2459/1997 IMRAT @ PATIRAM AWADH TRIPATHI,SMT.INDIRA TRIPATHI /
Versus
THE STATE OF M.P. ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

3. CRA 2583/1997 THE STATE OF M.P. A.G. /
Versus
SHIVNARAYAN ARUN NEMA,ANOOP SHANDILYA(R1)
.

4. CRA 1490/1999 PANNA LAL PATEL AND ORS. M.PATERIYA,BRIJESH CHOUBEY,AK.BAIN,RK.SONI,
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
AP.CHOUDHARY
.

5. CRA 1278/2004 INDRA KUMAR MATANI JS.SINGH,AK.DUBEY
ANIRUDDH K.MISHRA,C.P.DWIVEDI
S.C.YADAV,JAMNA YADAV
MANISH MISHRA
Versus
AJAY KUMAR PANDEY SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI,SMT.S.,RK.TIWARI,PRAKASH GUPTA
.
WITH

6. CRA 1279/2004 INDIRA KUMAR MATANI JAGAT SHER SINGH,AK.DUBEY
ANIRUDDH K.MISHRA,C.P.DWIVEDI
S.C.YADAV,JAMNA YADAV
Versus
AJAY KUMAR PANDEY SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI,SMT.S.,RK.TIWARI,PRAKASH GUPTA

7. CRA 1439/2007 MANISH SAHU MADAN SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.
WITH

8. CRA 1800/2007 JAHAR SUDEEP DEB
MADAN SINGH,GAYATRI LADHIYA,UMESH SHIVHARE
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.

9. CRA 1678/2007 MATHURA MUKESH PANDEY,HS.VERMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
ARVIND TIWARI
ARVIND TIWARI(COMP.)
.

10. CRA 2237/2007 SONU AILAS KANJA ALIAS ROHIT SONKAR AKHILESH TIWARI,J.SHRIVASTAVA
V.K.TYAGI, CM.KUSHWAHA
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. SOLANKI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARUN DUBEY,MUKESH MISHRA,VIJAY AWASTHI
NILESH TIWARI,K.S.LODHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.

11. CRA 2285/2007 MONU ALIAS SHYAM RAKESH TIWARI,MUKESH PATHKAR,RAJKUMAR GUPTA
SP.GAUTAM ,SK.DWIVEDI
PC.PATEL,SANGEETA SHARMA,RAMAN PATEL
SUNITA JAISWAL,SATYENDRA GAUTAM
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.

12. CRA 570/2008 HAKAM AJAY KUMAR JAIN,RAJEEV BARKUR,PC.PATEL,RAMAN
PATEL
PC.PATEL[CHANGE COUNSELR]
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.
.
WITH

13. CRA 81/2010 MAKHAN RAMAN PATEL
SANGEETA SHARMA, P.C.PATEL,A.KHATRI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

14. CRA 1812/2008 DIVAKAR PRASAD SP.MISHRA,J.TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

15. CRA 2376/2008 SANJAY CHAURASIYA PRAKASH UPADHYAY,ASHISH TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

16. CRA 2517/2008 SANJAY CHAURASIYA PRAKASH UPADHYAY,RAHUL TRIPATHI
ROSHAN,ABHAY S KUSHWAHA,KG.TIWARI
PARAG S CHATURVEDI,PARIMAL PUNEET CHATURVEDI,
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

17. CRA 1148/2009 RATIRAM SEN ABHILASH DEY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
.

18. CRA 346/2010 ASIF @ ASHIQUE A.D.MISHRA
K.L.PRAJAPATI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

19. CRA 536/2010 GULAB LODHI ASHOK CHAKRAVARTI
R.S.CHAKRAWARTI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

20. CRA 2664/2011 DURJAN PRASAD AHIRWAR N.S. RUPARAH
Pg:3 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. SOLANKI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
V TIWARI, YS BAGHEL
SANKALP KOCHAR, V MISHRA, SK DIXIT, S PANDEY,
SMT.A.RUPRAH,
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

21. CRA 2679/2011 SHEIKH IRFAN @ CHHOTU @ ANAS SANJAY GUPTA
SANJAY PANDEY, PRAVEEN KATAHARA, K.KHARE
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.
WITH

22. CRA 400/2012 ASHFAQ KHAN RAHUL TRIPATHI
SUNIL MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL

23. CRA 1209/2012 AKHILESH KAMAL SINGH RAJPUT
A.K.TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

24. CRA 1795/2012 MANISH VEERA P.N. DUBEY
PRAVEEN DUBEY, NAVEEN DUBEY, SEEPJA DUBEY
Versus
MOHAN RAI SHASHANK UPADHYAYA
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1w1874000
01.txt

1. CR 1277/2003 BULO BAI AND ORS SHOBHITADITYA,MOTILAL KUSHWAHA
Versus
STATE OF M.P. AND ANR AG.,PL.SHRIVASTAV,NILESH PILLAI,P.DWIVEDI[2]
SUDESH VERMA,NIDHI VERMA,MANJEET CHUKKAL
.

2. SA 1793/2006 NARESH GOLCHA PRANAY VERMA,RAHUL SINGH
Versus
SUNITA GUPTA G.SHRIVASTAVA ,N.JAIN,S.PATEL
.
WITH

3. SA 1794/2006 NARESH GOLCHA PRANAY VERMA,RAHUL SINGH
Versus
SURESH GUPTA GIRISH SHRIVASTAVA,D.SHRIVASTAVA,J.SRHIVASTAV
N.JAIN,S.PATEL
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1w1879000
01.txt

1. MCRC 542/2013 ANNU @ ANAND PARAG S. CHATURVEDI
BHARAT DUBEY
PUNEET PARIMAL CHATURVEDI,ABHAY S.KUSHWAHA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

2. MCRC 1931/2013 ANRAJ ANAND DUTT MISHRA
VIJAY KUMAR PANDEY,RAJKUMAR UPADHYAY
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

3. MCRC 5434/2013 AKASH ARVIND SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

4. MCRC 5437/2013 PAWAN BERMAN ARVIND SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

5. MCRC 6065/2013 MOHD. ISLAM @ RAJU RAJESH TIWARI
VIJAY SHUKLA,ASHOK PALI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1w1882000
01.txt

1. WP 610/2012(S) ADITYA TIWARI RAMSUPHAL CHATURVEDI
D.K.DIXIT, ANSHUL DIXIT, SHAILESH JAIN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL,PIYUSH DHARMADHIKARI
M.S.PANDITYA [14]
M.S.PANDITYA [13]
M.S.PANDITYA [12]
M.S.PANDITYA [10]
M.S.PANDITYA [9]
M.S.PANDITYA [8]
M.S.PANDITYA [6]
M.S. PANDITIA, ARJUN SINGH [5]
SHARAD SINGH BAGHEL,ARJUN YADAV(R-11)
G.A.(R-1,2)
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
1w1885000
01.txt

SINGLE BENCH ( CRIMINAL )
Pg:1 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE
COURT ROOM NO.: 16
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
[FOR DELIVERY OF JUDGEMENT]
.

1. CRA 155/1998 THE STATE OF M.P. A.G. , SAVITA CHOUDHARY
Versus
NATHURAM RAJNIKANT KHARE
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
2w1872000
01.txt

25. CRA 90/2012 DILIP KUSHWAHA P.S.TIWARI
MANISH TIWARI, ASHISH TIWARI, SMT.ARTI TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.
WITH

26. CRA 1548/2011 NAGEENA BEE HIMANSHU CHOURASIYA
HIMANSHU CHOURASIA,PRAMOD THAKRE
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
WITH

27. CRA 2506/2011 AFSAR KHAN SMT. C.P. GOLANDAZ
YOGENDRA GOLANDAZ
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
REGISTRAR(J-II)
4w1872000
01.txt

28. CRR 1796/1999 DAUWA UMAKANT SHARMA,TD.PANDEY,RK.PATEL,SV.TRIPATHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH /A.G.
.

29. CRR 1463/2009 SMT.SHASHI KALAL VERMA ASEEM DIXIT
VIJAY NAYAK, A NAYAK
S.D.MISHRA
Versus
SHOBHA RAM VERMA P.S.TOMAR
.

30. CRR 1930/2011 VINOD CHAMAR MUKESH PANDEY
M.SHRIVASTAVA, H.S.VARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
MANISH GAVANE, B PATEL, CB SINGH(R2)
.

31. CRR 330/2012 ROHIT GARG VINAY PANE
SANJAY SONI, AJAY SEN
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

32. CRR 309/2013 SUREKHA SINGH SIDDHARTH DATT
YOGESH SONI
NISHANT DATT, PUSHPENDRA DUBEY, AJAY MISHRA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
BALBIR SINGH SAINI,KUNAL THAKRE [R2, R3, R4]
.
WITH

33. CRR 437/2013 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
Versus
SATYENDRA KUMAR
WITH

34. CRR 589/2013 SATYENDRA KUMAR VYAS BALKRISHNA CHANSORIYA
KUNAL THAKRE, BHANU PRATAP SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

35. CRR 1181/2010 KITIN AGRAWAL MANIKANT SHARMA
NALINI GURUNG
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
KAMAL SINGH RAJPOOT,AK TIWARI,LALJI KUSHWAHA(R2,3)
.

36. CRR 456/2012 AIRIK LAJRAS SHIMLA JAIN
SANDESH DIXIT
MANISH THAKUR
ALOK JAIN, NITIN JAIN
Pg:2 DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR TUESDAY 18/06/2013

BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. SOLANKI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
SMT.NIRMALA DEVI MANISH KUMAR TIWARI,S.P.GAUTAM,MUKTA BHATELE
SATISH SHARMA,VIRENDRA KEWAT,S.KHAN(R-1)
.

37. CRR 392/2013 SURESH PRASAD SHUKLA PRAKASH UPADHYAY
BRAJENDRA KUSHWAHA
SHIVENDRA UPADHYAY, RAHUL TRIPATHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

38. CRR 400/2013 DHOOMA P.S. TIWARI
MANISH TIWARI, ASHISH TIWARI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

39. CRR 403/2013 VEER BAHADUR SINGH A.P. SINGH
NOKESH DUBEY
VIVEK SHUKLA,RAJENDRA SINGH,PRAVEEN SHARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.

40. CRR 611/2013 QAMAR ALI IMTIAZ HUSAIN
MOHD. QASIM, ISHTEYAQ HUSAIN, SANJEEV JAISWAL
Versus
SMT. GAZALA ALI
.

41. CRR 347/2013 RAKESH MISHRA RAMESH TAMRAKAR
ASHISH UPADHYAY
Versus
WIDOW MAANWATI SAKET PRAVEEN VERMA, DR. JYOTI PRAVEEN VERM,
R.A.SHRIVASTAVA [R1]
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
5w1872000
01.txt

42. MCRC 8855/2006 SANJAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA NS.SMT.A.RUPRAH,KU.JYOTI SHILIPKAR
Versus
SMT.PRATHIBHA SHRIVASTAVA RP PRAJAPATI,NARESH SHARMA
AADESH JAMOLKAR(R-1)
VINAY PANDEY,AJAY SEN,SANJAY SONI,ASHISH DUBEY
.

43. MCRC 2665/2007 SUNNY GAUR J.S.SINGH,A.K.DUBEY
Versus
DR. P.D. SHRIVASTAVA AG.,JK PILLAI,HARSHIT PATEL,N ACHARYA,
ASHISH SHROTI,VIKRAM JOHRI[1]
VN SHARMA,ABHAY PANDEY(1)
.
WITH

44. MCRC 2666/2007 SANNY GAUR JAGAT SHER SINGH,AK.DUBEY
Versus
DR.P.D.SHRIVASTAVA AG.,JK PILLAI,HARSHIT PATEL,VN SHARMA,
ASHISH SHROTI,VIKRAM JOHRI[1]
N ACHARYA,ABHAY PANDEY(1)
WITH

45. MCRC 2667/2007 SUNNY GAUR J.S.SINGH,A.K.DUBEY
MANISH MISHRA
Versus
DR. P.D.SHRIVASTAVA AG.,JK PILLAI,HARSHIT PATEL,VN SHARMA,
ASHISH SHROTI,VIKRAM JOHRI1]
N ACHARYA,ABAHY PANDEY(1)
[HELD-UP CASES]
.

46. MCRC 6800/2007 K.L.MEHTA MANISH DATT,SIDDHART DATT,RAJESH PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AG.,SANDESH DIXIT,S.K.THAKUR,S.A.KHAN,
D.SINGH
.

47. MCRC 7954/2008 M/S M.AND M.TIRES DINESH KOSHAL,PRAKASH KORI
Versus
WASIM SHIV KUMAR DUBEY,RAVENDRA SHUKLA [1]
.

48. MCRC 9252/2009 CHANDAN PRAKASH @ CHANDAN VISHWAKARMA J.N.TRIPATHI
BABU VISHWAKARMA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
6w1872000
01.txt

49. CRR 384/2013 KALIRAM VIKASH SHARMA
S.NJAISANI, SNAJEEV CHANSORIYA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ADVOCATE GENERAL
.
REGISTRAR(J-II)
REGISTRAR(J-II)
REGISTRAR(J-II)
REGISTRAR(J-II)